Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

21 vessels over the weekend: Strait of Hormuz sets traffic record despite Iranian threats

During April 4-5, more vessels passed through the Strait of Hormuz than at any time since the onset of regional tensions. The figure is straightforward — the conclusions are more complex.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 6, 2026 · 2 min read

21 vessels over the weekend: Strait of Hormuz sets traffic record despite Iranian threats
LPG-танкер Jag Vasant під прапором Індії, що пройшов Ормузьку протоку (Фото: EPA / DIVYAKANT SOLANKI)

Twenty-one vessels in two days. That is exactly how many merchant and tanker ships crossed the Strait of Hormuz over the weekend of April 4-5 — the highest figure since the escalation around Iran began.

The Strait is 33 kilometers of water between Iran and Oman, through which approximately 20% of global oil trade passes. Tehran has repeatedly threatened to block it: in response to sanctions, US military presence, and support for Israel. The threats came and went — the strait kept operating. But the peak traffic happening right now requires explanation.

Why more vessels now, not fewer

The paradox is explained by several factors. First, some buyers of Iranian oil — primarily Chinese refineries — are increasing imports ahead of new American tariffs and possible strengthening of sanctions pressure from the Trump administration. Second, vessels that previously circumvented the region due to risks of Houthi attacks in the Red Sea are partially returning to traditional routes: Hormuz appears more predictable than Bab el-Mandeb.

In other words, the surge in traffic is not a signal of de-escalation. It is a signal that global logistics is recalculating risks in real time and choosing the lesser of two evils.

Iranian leverage: real or decorative

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy has technical means to partially disrupt shipping — mines, speedboats, coastal missile systems. But completely blocking the strait would mean hitting Iran's own oil exports, which use the same corridor, and would almost guarantee a military response from the US and its allies.

This is exactly why, despite a decade of blockade threats, it has never happened. Instead, Iran uses the strait as a tool of pressure — detaining individual vessels, demonstrating naval presence, simulating interception maneuvers. This is expensive for insurance markets and cheap for Tehran.

What record traffic changes

For Ukraine, the context is not abstract: the price of oil, which is shaped in part by Hormuz traffic, directly affects Russia's revenues. Every quarter when oil stays above $70 is billions added to the Kremlin's budget. Record traffic through the strait pushes prices down by increasing market supply — and this is one of the few indirect economic mechanisms to impact the Russian war machine that works without any Western decision.

If the Trump administration does strengthen sanctions against Iranian exports and traffic through Hormuz drops sharply — will the market be ready to compensate for the loss of Iranian volumes without a new price spike that would again fill the Russian treasury?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026