Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Ukrzaliznytsia puts 212 tonnes of spent lubricants up for auction: why the state-owned company is selling rather than recycling

Ukrzaliznytsia is holding five auctions on Prozorro.Sales on April 7 — the starting price is 4.48 million hryvnias. Behind the numbers is a question the company has yet to resolve.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 30, 2026 · 1 min read

Ukrzaliznytsia puts 212 tonnes of spent lubricants up for auction: why the state-owned company is selling rather than recycling
Фото: Прозорро.Продажі

Ukrzaliznytsia has put up for auction 212 tons of used motor oils from its own locomotive fleet. Five lots will appear on the Prozorro.Sales platform on April 7 — the bidding will be English-style, meaning the price rises from a starting 4.48 million hryvnias.

Oils are a byproduct of railway operations. Ukrzaliznytsia accumulates them regularly but does not have its own processing capacities. The press service of Prozorro.Sales reported that the company had previously suspended this sales channel, and has now returned to it as the "most effective."

The auction addresses three tasks at once: disposal without violating environmental standards, additional income to the company's budget, and supplying the secondary raw materials market. Open bidding theoretically ensures competition among buyers and a market, rather than negotiated, price.

The logic is understandable — but only up to a point. Ukrzaliznytsia is one of the country's largest state-owned companies, with thousands of units of rolling stock. Selling used oils in batches of 212 tons through public tenders is an operational decision, not a strategic one. The company lacks its own processing capacities, and no public plans to create them or to sign long-term contracts with processors have been announced.

The question is not whether it is right to hold an auction — Prozorro exists as a mechanism precisely for that. The question is different: if Ukrzaliznytsia generates hundreds of tons of such raw material each year, why does the decision remain situational rather than systemic — and who ultimately profits from processing what the state company sells without processing itself?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026