Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

340,000 barrels per day: why NORSI's shutdown hurts not only Lukoil

After a drone strike on April 5, an oil refinery that produces 11% of all Russian gasoline shut down. But the biggest problem is not the fire, but the fact that Russia has been unable to repair the installation since 2022.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 7, 2026 · 2 min read

340,000 barrels per day: why NORSI's shutdown hurts not only Lukoil
Фото: EPA

On the night of April 5, Ukrainian drones struck the Lukoil-Nizhnegorordsintez (NORSI) oil refinery in Kstovo, Nizhny Novgorod region. The plant halted production — Reuters confirmed this citing its own sources.

What burned and why this is not "just a fire"

The strike hit the L-24/300 hydrotreating unit — a node responsible for producing commercial gasoline and diesel of standard suitable for use. This is not auxiliary infrastructure: without it, the refinery can process crude oil, but cannot obtain the final product of the required quality.

According to Reuters, NORSI's capacity is approximately 405,000 metric tons of gasoline per month, or 11% of total Russian production. Monthly downtime will cost Lukoil approximately $100 million in lost revenue.

Sanctions made repairs a structural problem

The attack struck a plant that had serious problems even without drones. In early 2024, NORSI's gas compressor turbine broke down. It turned out that the only company that knew how to repair it was the American UOP, the oil refining division of Honeywell. After the 2022 invasion, it left Russia.

"They rushed to find spare parts and found nothing. Then the entire unit just shut down,"

— a source close to Lukoil, Reuters

Since all major Russian refineries use at least some Western equipment, sanctions have turned each subsequent attack into potentially irreversible damage. Restoration is possible, but not with the same equipment and not with the same expertise.

Context: systemic pressure, not a single strike

NORSI was not attacked for the first time — the plant suffered damage earlier in 2025. In parallel, Ukraine is striking oil export terminals: Primorsk on the Baltic and Ust-Luga have already been hit this year. According to KSE analysts' estimates, cumulative losses remain moderate against Russia's projected $160 billion in oil revenues in 2025 — but this assumes the pace of attacks does not increase.

As analyst Sergiy Vakulenko notes, sustained pressure requires maintaining the March pace of strikes. Shutting down one unit is an acceptable loss for the system. Shutting down five simultaneously — it is not.

If Lukoil confirms that the L-24/300 unit requires equipment replacement under sanctions, the question becomes concrete: will Russia find a workaround for supplies through third countries — and how quickly will the West detect this?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026