Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

40 Years Without Prozorro: Chornomorska Concession Enters Bidding Phase on Terms

The competitive dialogue tender commission has launched a 75-day competitive dialogue with investors regarding two terminals at the Port of Chornomorsk — Ukraine's largest port PPP project in history is proceeding without mandatory electronic bidding oversight.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 13, 2026 · 2 min read

40 Years Without Prozorro: Chornomorska Concession Enters Bidding Phase on Terms
Фото: порт Чорноморськ

On May 13, the tender commission officially opened a competitive dialogue with potential investors competing for a 40-year concession of the First and Container Terminals of the Chornomorsk Maritime Trade Port. All admitted participants signed non-disclosure agreements and gained access to project documentation. The dialogue will last 75 days.

What the numbers mean

According to Vice Prime Minister Oleksiy Kuleba, more than 40 international port operators and investors from four continents have expressed interest in the competition. If successfully implemented, the state could receive up to $1 billion over 40 years. The capacity of the two terminals is up to 760,000 TEU and over 5 million tons of cargo per year; in 2025, the port's container traffic has already grown by 66%, to 215,748 TEU.

The competition is supported by the EBRD and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) — their participation is presented as a guarantee of compliance with international standards.

The mechanism — and questions about it

The competitive dialogue format provides that the final project model — investment commitments, technological solutions, risk distribution — is formed during negotiations with pre-qualified participants, rather than being predetermined by an open tender. This means: the state and investors together write the rules of the game after the pool of players is determined.

"A concession is not privatization; the state retains ownership rights and controls the investor's performance of obligations"

First Deputy Minister Alona Shkrum

However, in December 2024, the Cabinet of Ministers by Resolution No. 1613 postponed until 2027 a requirement obligating concession competitions to be conducted through Prozorro. This means the country's largest infrastructure PPP project will take place without a mandatory public electronic system — the same system that became the standard for fighting corruption in procurement.

Critics point to a paradox: the State Enterprise "Chornomorsk Maritime Trade Port" reported revenue of 1.9 billion hryvnias and net profit of 760 million hryvnias in 2024, with assets of 2.5 billion hryvnias — the enterprise is profitable. The question of whether it needs external management remains without a public response from the Ministry of Development.

Three stages — and where the control is

  • Pre-qualification — completed: financial capacity and experience in managing port facilities were verified.
  • Competitive dialogue — current stage, 75 days: formation of the final project model together with participants.
  • Submission of proposals and evaluation — selection based on technical and financial criteria, signing a contract with the winner.

The control mechanism after contract signing — investor KPIs, termination conditions, sanctions for non-performance — has not been publicly disclosed.

If during the 75-day dialogue period the state does not fix in public access the specific investment commitments of the winner before contract signing, "the largest PPP project in Ukraine's history" will remain a statement of intent with a 40-year horizon and without a verified implementation mechanism.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026