Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

59% of shadow fleet changed course after Swedish inspections — and this is just the beginning of pressure

Ship tracking data shows: 13 of 22 sanctioned tankers are already bypassing Swedish waters via Bornholm. But the new Swedish procedure has not yet even become fully operational.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 24, 2026 · 2 min read

59% of shadow fleet changed course after Swedish inspections — and this is just the beginning of pressure
Танкер Caffa (Фото: Vesselfinder)

Thirteen of the 22 sanctioned tankers moving through the Baltic since April 7 have passed south of the Danish island of Bornholm — instead of taking the usual northern route along the Swedish coast. This represents 59% of the fleet, and Swedish inspections have not even become systematic yet.

Why the route changed now

Sweden began inspecting vessels — checking documents, insurance, and classification certificates — following a series of incidents involving suspicious ships in the Baltic Sea. According to Bloomberg, tankers are responding to these inspections preemptively: they change course before even making contact with the coast guard.

Notably, the fleet's reaction is immediate but not catastrophic for Moscow: the southern route through Bornholm is longer and more expensive, but passable. The tankers did not stop — they adapted.

Context: what is the "usual route"

Until April, shadow tankers were loaded in Primorsk or Ust-Luga, passed through the Gulf of Finland, moved along the Baltic states and Poland, and then — further north, closer to the Swedish coast. As Bloomberg documented in 2024, many vessels stopped near Gotland island to refuel and load supplies.

"What frightens me most is a collision. These are old, obsolete vessels. There is terrible traffic. If there is a spill, it will be a catastrophe."

— Danish pilot Pedersen, Bloomberg

This pilot guides shadow tankers through Danish waters on average twice a week — and says some vessels are in such poor condition that colleagues refuse to stay aboard even overnight.

How many are there really

In 2025, 292 sanctioned vessels passed through Danish straits — a level comparable to 2023–2024. Meanwhile, 30 to 40 shadow tankers are anchored between Finland and Estonia — in a six-mile strip of international waters beyond the jurisdiction of EU countries.

Russia, for its part, has increased military presence to escort these vessels. Estonian Navy Commander Ivo Vark said last week that the growth in Russian naval presence has increased the risk of escalation — to a level where Estonia would consider intervention only in case of a real threat to infrastructure or an oil spill.

A precedent that changes the logic

In January 2026, Germany forced the tanker Arcusat to turn around — a vessel that formally "does not exist" in international databases. If Sweden, Belgium, and Britain scale up such practices, the logistical equation for Russian oil exports from the Baltic will become significantly more complicated.

But for now, the tankers have only shifted several dozen miles south. A route change is not a stop to exports.

The question is not whether inspections will stop the shadow fleet — they will not. The question is whether Sweden and Denmark have enough resources and political will to turn episodic inspections into systematic control before one of these old tankers collides with another vessel or runs aground near Gotland.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026