Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

60 attack drones targeting Naftogaz facilities in two days — what it means for Ukraine's energy security

Russia struck gas production and storage facilities in the Kharkiv and Chernihiv regions. This is not just destruction — it threatens reserves and the functioning of infrastructure. We examine why the attacks happened now and what the consequences are.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 25, 2026 · 2 min read

60 attack drones targeting Naftogaz facilities in two days — what it means for Ukraine's energy security
Фото: Генштаб ЗСУ

Two days of attacks — the facts

According to Serhiy Koretskyi, head of the board of NAK «Naftogaz», over the past two days roughly 60 strike drones were used in total against two company facilities in Kharkiv and Chernihiv regions. The strikes hit a gas production enterprise and one of the gas storage facilities.

"For two days nonstop there have been attacks on gas storage facilities and production capacities in Kharkiv and Chernihiv regions. About 60 strike drones were used in total. There is destruction."

— Serhiy Koretskyi, head of the board of NAK «Naftogaz»

Nizhyn mayor Oleksandr Kodola confirmed the UAV attack and reported a hit in the vicinity of the city, but outside the community boundaries.

"A UAV attack and a hit in the area of the city were recorded; there are no casualties within the community."

— Oleksandr Kodola, mayor of Nizhyn (Chernihiv region)

Why this matters

Naftogaz produces more than 80% of Ukraine's gas; the main capacities are concentrated in the east — in Poltava and Kharkiv regions. Attacks on production and storage threaten not only infrastructure but also supplies, the logistics of injection and distribution of fuel, which directly affects the stability of the heating season and the operation of industrial consumers.

Energy experts note that such strikes are part of a strategy to undermine critical infrastructure, to test Ukraine's air defense system, and to create additional burdens on logistics and repair services. This matches previously recorded patterns of attacks on the energy sector during this war.

Consequences and what to know next

The immediate consequences are damage to facilities and the need to assess losses, evacuate equipment and carry out repairs. Among the medium-term risks are lower injection levels into underground storage and a potential rise in logistics costs for delivering gas to the market.

The response is a combination of measures: rapid restoration of critical infrastructure, strengthening air defense systems in vulnerable areas, and coordination with international partners on supplying equipment and reserve fuel volumes. Analysts urge monitoring official statements from «Naftogaz» and government decisions on stabilizing reserves.

Conclusion

Attacks on energy capacities are not just about destruction: they are a test of the country's energy supply system. The ball is now in the operators', the government's and partners' court: whether they can quickly eliminate the consequences and build up protection — the resilience of supplies in the coming months depends on it.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026