Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

$97 Million → $1.27 Billion: How Zoom Accidentally Made the Best Investment of Its Crisis Era

Zoom invested less than $100 million in Anthropic as part of a partnership agreement — and received a 13x return. This is not a venture strategy, but a corporate stroke of luck that now needs to be explained to shareholders somehow.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 23, 2026 · 2 min read

$97 Million → $1.27 Billion: How Zoom Accidentally Made the Best Investment of Its Crisis Era
Фото: depositphotos.com

May 2023. Zoom had just endured a post-pandemic stock collapse of 85% from its peak, was actively seeking new growth opportunities, and signed a partnership with an then-unknown AI startup Anthropic. A $51 million investment through Zoom Ventures looked like a technical deposit for future integration — not a bet on the next player in the industry.

Two years later, that stake is worth $1.27 billion.

What happened to the numbers

According to regulatory filings disclosed on May 22, Zoom invested a total of approximately $97 million in two tranches — roughly $51 million in May 2023 and another $46 million later. As Bloomberg reports, the current market value of this stake is $1.27 billion. The multiplier: over 13x in two years.

For comparison: Zoom's core business in the first quarter of 2025 generated revenue of $1.24 billion — meaning this entire investment already equals one quarter of the company's revenue.

Why Anthropic grew so much

Anthropic went from being a niche competitor to OpenAI to a company valued at over $61 billion at the time of Zoom's data disclosure. According to CEO Dario Amodei, usage and revenue alone grew 80-fold in the first quarter of 2025. Anthropic is currently in talks about a new funding round worth up to $30 billion — at a company valuation of around $900 billion, according to Bloomberg.

"The strategic stake was initially positioned to integrate Claude large language models into Zoom's federated AI architecture"

— from Zoom's regulatory filing to the SEC

The paradox: success that wasn't planned

Zoom is not a venture fund. The company invested in Anthropic not as a financial speculator, but to gain access to Claude for its own products: AI Companion, meeting transcriptions, auto-summaries. In other words, the $97 million was essentially payment for technological partnership — and the billion-dollar profit turned out to be a side effect.

This puts management in an uncomfortable position: what to do with the paper profit? Selling the stake means locking in gains, but losing a strategic asset at a moment when Anthropic could become one of the key AI infrastructure providers. Holding it means remaining hostage to the valuation volatility of a private company.

Context: not just Zoom

Amazon ($4 billion in Anthropic) and Google (up to $2 billion) made similar bets. But their investments are a deliberate strategy to diversify their AI portfolio. Zoom found itself in this company almost by accident: through product necessity, not venture logic.

  • Amazon integrated Claude into AWS Bedrock and made Anthropic a central AI partner for its cloud business
  • Google embedded Claude in competitive analysis and its own products
  • Zoom uses Claude in AI Companion — but this is one of dozens of tools in a federated architecture, not an exclusive bet

The difference is significant: for Amazon and Google, Anthropic is a strategic necessity. For Zoom — a fortunate accident.

If Anthropic indeed closes a round at a $900 billion valuation and goes public within the next two years, Zoom's stake could be worth twice as much — but only if the company doesn't sell it earlier under pressure from shareholders who now see this asset as an easy way to finance ZM share buybacks.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026