Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

AMCU opens probe into price spike at gas stations: what it means for your wallet and the market

The Antimonopoly Committee's head was summoned to the Rada and an investigation has been launched — authorities are checking whether the chains acted in concert and how this will affect fuel supply and prices.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 11, 2026 · 2 min read

AMCU opens probe into price spike at gas stations: what it means for your wallet and the market
Фото: телеканал Рада / YouTube

Money loves silence: why you should read this

Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (AMCU) has opened proceedings on signs of anti-competitive coordinated actions in the fuel market — and this directly affects the budget of everyone who drives a car or depends on logistics. AMCU head Pavlo Kyrylenko came to the Verkhovna Rada on March 11 to report on the initial results and explain why the regulator started acting now.

What the AMCU has already done

According to Kyrylenko, the first signals of unjustified fuel price increases appeared on February 28. On March 2 the committee sent official requests to the largest chains and began meetings with individual market operators. On March 9 the case was formally opened for review, and on March 11 the AMCU chief reported to parliament.

"Despite the presence of objective factors driving up prices for light petroleum products, the committee does not rule out that such a situation may also have been caused by certain subjective factors."

— Pavlo Kyrylenko, head of the AMCU

What exactly is being investigated

The focus of the investigation is not on general market trends, but on the sequence and justification of price increases by each individual operator. The AMCU is analyzing whether companies had exclusive grounds for simultaneous and sharp hikes, or whether this could have been the result of coordinated actions.

Objective factors that also drive price increases

The regulator and the market name several real drivers: after the shutdown of the Kremenchuk refinery (expected from 2025), more than 85% of light petroleum products in Ukraine will depend on imports. At the same time, global quotations have fluctuated: on March 9 oil prices briefly exceeded $100 per barrel, whereas on March 11 futures were around $90 per barrel.

There was also a sharp jump in demand: sales of A-95 gasoline increased by 40–70%, diesel by 60–140%. Prices are also being pushed up by higher logistics costs and forecasts of further increases in production costs.

What this means for consumers and the market

If the investigation finds coordinated actions, operators face fines and obligations to change their pricing practices. Even without such findings, the combination of import dependence, global market volatility and a demand spike creates the risk of short-term price waves and possible local shortages.

What happens next

The AMCU said the review will focus specifically on subjective market factors — the sequence of operators' decisions and whether each company has justifications. Market analysts and media, including LIGA.net, are already analyzing in more detail which supply and pricing scenarios are possible in the coming months.

Now the ball is in the operators' and the regulator's court: whether explanations will turn into concrete corrective steps that reduce pressure on prices is a question on which the wallets of many Ukrainians depend.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026