Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Aramco: Closure of the Strait of Hormuz Risks Disrupting Supply Chains — What It Means for Ukraine

If shipping through the Strait of Hormuz is halted for an extended period, it will hit more than just the oil market. We explain who will be affected by the supply shock and why this matters for Ukraine right now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 10, 2026 · 3 min read

Aramco: Closure of the Strait of Hormuz Risks Disrupting Supply Chains — What It Means for Ukraine
Фото: EPA / ALI HAIDER

What Aramco said and why it matters

The CEO of the Saudi company Aramco, Amin Nasser, told reporters he warned of serious risks if the Strait of Hormuz is closed further. Reuters reports that he called the potential consequences "catastrophic" for global oil markets — and warned that the longer disruptions continue, the harder the hit will be to the world economy.

"For global oil markets this will have catastrophic consequences, and the longer these disruptions continue... the more acute the implications for the global economy will be. Although we have faced disruptions in the past, the current crisis is certainly the largest the region's oil and gas industry has faced."

— Amin Nasser, CEO of Aramco (Reuters)

Chain of effects: from tankers to the supermarket

Nasser points not only to oil prices. He emphasizes a domino effect: the halt of tanker traffic and disruptions in the insurance market raise the cost of maritime transport, which affects fuel logistics, aviation fuel, fertilizers, supplies of components for the automotive industry and raw materials for the agricultural sector. This is a typical chain mechanism where an energy shock spreads across the entire economy.

Aramco also reports that global oil stocks are at a five-year low. The company is currently not exporting oil from the Persian Gulf, although, according to Nasser, it is meeting most of its customers' needs. Recent strikes and interceptions have added further strain: after a drone attack on the Ras Tanura refinery, the plant is in the process of being restarted.

Context of the escalation

The escalation in the Middle East intensified after US and Israeli strikes on targets in Iran on 28 February 2026 — according to reports, this followed the collapse of talks over Iran's nuclear program. Iran, in response, struck infrastructure not only of the US and Israel but also of neighboring countries. On 7 March, Saudi Arabia said it had intercepted drones headed for the Shaybah field.

What this means for Ukraine

Fuel prices in Ukraine began to rise already in early March, Ukrainian media reported (LIGA.net). For a country that depends on stable logistics routes and access to fuel for its army and economy, further deterioration in global oil markets means increased pressure on the state budget and businesses.

In short: the risk of fuel shortages or further price increases could boost inflation, complicate logistics for the Armed Forces of Ukraine and affect costs in the agricultural and transport sectors. This is a test for strategic reserves and for partners' ability to quickly turn words into contracts and deliveries.

Summary and outlook

Aramco's statements are not hysteria but a signal from one of the market's key players: if a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is prolonged, the consequences will be widespread and long-lasting. The main priorities for Ukraine are to monitor the situation, build up reserves, diversify supply chains and press international partners for concrete steps in energy deliveries. This is a problem of global energy security that is already showing up in citizens' purchasing power and in state spending on defense and logistics.

Reuters and Aramco are sending a signal: declarations by partners now need to be converted into concrete contracts and deliveries, otherwise the economic blow from escalation in the Middle East could be felt by much broader segments of the global population — including Ukraine.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026