Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Australia imposes its broadest sanctions package on Russia since 2022 — targeting energy, banks and cryptocurrencies

Surgutneftegaz, the airline S7, about fifty banks and several crypto platforms have been placed under sanctions. What does this mean for the Kremlin's revenues and Ukraine's security — we break it down point by point.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 24, 2026 · 2 min read

Australia imposes its broadest sanctions package on Russia since 2022 — targeting energy, banks and cryptocurrencies
Фото: depositphotos.com

In high diplomacy, it's not loud statements but concrete steps that matter

On Tuesday, 24 February, the Australian government announced the imposition of targeted sanctions on 180 individuals and legal entities and a number of vessels of the “shadow fleet” linked to Russia. Foreign Minister Penny Wong described this as Australia's largest package of restrictions since February 2022. For Ukraine this is not only symbolic solidarity but a pragmatic step that cuts the aggressor's financial flows.

What exactly was targeted

The sanctions affected key sectors: finance, defense, aviation, energy, transport and technology. Among the names and brands — Surgutneftegaz, the airline S7, around fifty banks, as well as the elite UAV unit “Rubikon”. This is aimed at reducing the revenues the Kremlin can direct to support its military campaign.

Cryptocurrencies — a new line of pressure

For the first time Australia is openly targeting crypto structures used for cross-border payments and sanctions evasion. Platforms included in the restrictions are Netex24, B-Crypto, the Kyrgyz exchange Grinex, the company Tengricoin/Meer Crypto Exchange and Old Vector with the ruble-linked stablecoin A7A5. This is an important signal: digital money is ceasing to be a “hideout” for evading the sanctions regime.

Context: partner coordination and potential weaknesses

The Australian move comes against the backdrop of British announcements about a large package of restrictions — roughly 300 names. At the same time the EU could not adopt the 20th package because Hungary blocked it over oil transit on the “Druzhba” pipeline. Analysts note: sanctions work best when they are synchronized with partners and close channels of evasion — from transport to crypto platforms.

"Today and every day Australia will continue to fight for a just and lasting peace that respects Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity..."

— Penny Wong, Australia's foreign minister

What this means for Ukraine and what to work on next

In short — it reduces the Kremlin's financial space: restrictions on energy companies, banks and crypto services complicate the raising and laundering of funds for the war. But the effect will depend on three things: partners' ability to coordinate further steps, the speed of blocking channels of evasion, and control over transit flows of energy carriers.

Now the ball is in the partners' court: declarations must turn into coordinated action — and it is in this context that the further impact of the sanctions on Russia's ability to finance offensive operations should be assessed.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026