Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

BEB: Vapes Outside the Law — But Not Under the Law. Tsivinski Wants Clarity

The Director of the Bureau of Economic Security acknowledged that the state is stuck between two options: either legalize the electronic cigarette market with proper taxation, or impose a direct ban. There is no more gray area — only profitable chaos remains.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 13, 2026 · 2 min read

BEB: Vapes Outside the Law — But Not Under the Law. Tsivinski Wants Clarity
Фото: БЕБ

The shadow market for vapes in Ukraine exists not because the state is unaware of it. It exists because the state has yet to decide what it is — a legal business or a crime.

Director of the Bureau of Economic Security Vadym Tsivinsky publicly acknowledged the stalemate: the BES cannot effectively combat illegal circulation of electronic cigarettes as long as the status of this market remains blurred. According to him, the only way out is either clear legalization with excise taxes and licensing, or direct criminalization of production and sales.

What is happening in the market now

Electronic cigarettes are formally not banned, but also not fully regulated. This means: you can sell, but no one has set the rules of the game. As a result — mass imports without customs processing, sales without excise stamps, zero budget revenues.

According to various estimates, the share of illegal vapes on the Ukrainian market reaches 80–90%. This is not a marginal phenomenon — it is essentially the industry norm.

Why the BES cannot simply "shut down" the scheme

The problem is structural. When there is no clear law, there is no clear violation either. Law enforcement can record individual instances of excise tax evasion, but to systematically dismantle the market without a legislative framework is legally difficult and procedurally vulnerable.

Tsivinsky essentially passed the ball to parliament and the Cabinet of Ministers: the BES can enforce the law, but cannot replace it.

Two options — and both are painful

Legalization means excise taxes, licenses, labeling — and an automatic conflict with those who currently profit from duty-free imports. Shadow market players have the resources and motivation to slow down any regulation.

Criminalization is a tougher path, but it also does not guarantee results. Bans on tobacco products in various countries have consistently failed: demand does not disappear, it goes deeper underground.

Between these options is the current status quo, which benefits smuggling distributors and is disadvantageous to everyone else: neither the budget, nor consumers, nor legitimate business.

The scale of losses

Exact figures for excise tax shortfalls on vapes are not publicly available — which is telling in itself. For comparison: the illegal market for regular cigarettes costs the budget an estimated several billion hryvnias annually, according to analysts. The vape market is younger but growing faster.

If parliament adopts regulation this year — will the BES have the tools and political will to actually force the market to operate under new rules, rather than simply add another law that goes unenforced?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026