Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Blockade of the Strait of Hormuz Paralyzes Fertilizer Supplies — Why It Threatens Ukraine and the World

Financial Times warns: the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on fertilizer plants are causing disruptions that could quickly affect prices and yields. How this will impact Ukraine's planting season and global food security — in an easy-to-follow breakdown.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 5, 2026 · 3 min read

Blockade of the Strait of Hormuz Paralyzes Fertilizer Supplies — Why It Threatens Ukraine and the World
Фото: Depositphotos

What happened and why it matters

Financial Times reports: the war in the Middle East and Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz have led to severe disruptions in the supply of mineral fertilizers from the region. This is not a local problem — a significant share of the world's exports of key fertilizer components passes through this route: approximately 35% of urea, about 45% of sulfur and large volumes of ammonia needed for the production of nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers.

Experts say it plainly

"We must not underestimate what this could potentially mean for global food production"

— Svein Tore Holseter, CEO of Yara International

According to consulting firm CRU, it is the physical blockade of the Strait of Hormuz that distinguishes this crisis from previous ones — this is a logistical barrier, not just market fluctuations.

Short timeline: when consumers will feel it

Analysts warn that supply chains react quickly: changes in fertilizer availability can affect bread prices as soon as 6–10 weeks, eggs — within a few months, and poultry and pork meat — roughly within six months. This is the forecast of food-systems expert Raj Patel.

"If [fertilizers] do not reach farmers' fields, yields could fall by up to 50% already at the first harvest"

— Svein Tore Holseter, Yara International

Pricing and the energy factor

Fertilizer prices have already started rising sharply: Argus Media records an increase in the price of granular urea in the Middle East of about $130 per tonne. Ammonia futures in Europe have also jumped significantly. Additional pressure comes from energy: natural gas — the key feedstock for nitrogen fertilizer production — and its price rise immediately increases production costs.

How this is different from 2022

Analysts point out: in 2022 the shock was primarily due to a sharp rise in energy prices and logistical problems after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The current situation differs in that there is a physical blockade of a key sea route and attacks on production sites. Because of this, disruptions may be faster and wider in geographic impact.

"The big difference this time is that the blocked Strait of Hormuz is a physical barrier to supply"

— Chris Lawson, head of fertilizers at CRU Group

Attacks on production: the QatarEnergy example

Alongside the blockade, production in the region is also under attack: QatarEnergy temporarily halted operations at the Ras Laffan complex after a drone attack, which affected exports of urea, ammonia and sulfur. For the global market this means a simultaneous demand and supply shock.

What this means for Ukraine

Ukraine is a major player in the global grain market, and any reduction in global access to fertilizers increases competition for supplies and pushes up prices. For our spring sowing, availability of nitrogen and phosphates is of key importance: insufficient fertilizer application reduces yields and grain quality, which will complicate both the domestic food balance and export opportunities.

Practical consequences for Ukraine: it is necessary to quickly diversify supply chains, strengthen logistics for domestic stocks, and also support local fertilizer producers and farmers with priority subsidy and lending programs.

Short forecast and what to do next

If the blockade and attacks continue — pressure on prices and shortages of materials for the agricultural sector will intensify. For now the key question for governments and international partners is not only verbal signals but concrete steps: ensuring alternative routes, export quotas, credit support for farmers, and diplomatic pressure to secure guarantees for maritime routes.

"This time the consequences could be much more extensive"

— Raj Patel, food-systems expert

While attention is focused on headlines and diplomatic declarations, rapid operational decisions will be decisive for Ukraine's agricultural community: who and how will supply fields with fertilizers in the spring, how mobile will logistics be, and whether political support can be turned into actual deliveries. It's now up to partners and practical actions: declarations must be turned into cargo.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026