Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Bolt Restores Round-the-Clock Service in 24 Cities — What It Means for Nighttime Mobility Under Curfew

One of the leaders of Ukrainian ride‑hailing resumed night operations in most major cities from February 20. We explain who this will help, what restrictions apply, and why the decision is important right now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 20, 2026 · 1 min read

Bolt Restores Round-the-Clock Service in 24 Cities — What It Means for Nighttime Mobility Under Curfew
Фото: пресслужба Bolt

What happened

Taxi-ordering service Bolt resumed round-the-clock operations in 24 Ukrainian cities from February 20, the company's press service said. Previously this mode was in effect only in four cities — Lviv, Uzhhorod, Mukachevo and Kyiv.

List of cities: Bila Tserkva, Vinnytsia, Dnipro, Drohobych, Zhytomyr, Zaporizhzhia, Ivano‑Frankivsk, Kamianske, Kamianets‑Podilskyi, Kryvyi Rih, Kremenchuk, Kropyvnytskyi, Lutsk, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Poltava, Rivne, Sumy, Ternopil, Kharkiv, Khmelnytskyi, Cherkasy, Chernivtsi, Chernihiv.

"We see demand from users for the ability to travel at night"

— Serhii Pavlyk, General Manager of Bolt in Ukraine

Who needs it and why

The company emphasizes that nighttime trips are intended only for urgent needs: to get to a hospital, pharmacy, or train station, as well as to resilience points and facilities with independent power and heating. For people in critical situations, the restoration of round-the-clock service can be decisive.

Rules and restrictions

In most cities, movement during curfew requires having a permit — this remains a local requirement of authorities and security forces. Operational limitations should also be taken into account: there may not be a sufficient number of drivers or a safe route everywhere.

Recall: since January 17 Kyiv has allowed taxis to operate during curfew following a public appeal by the president and the declaration of a state of emergency in the energy sector — this decision set a precedent for other cities and service sectors.

What this means going forward

Essentially, Bolt's decision is a practical step to support nighttime mobility where it is needed. Its effectiveness will depend on three factors: coordination with local authorities on permits and security, the availability of drivers, and the stability of power supply. For many Ukrainians this is a relief for everyday needs; for the system, it is a test of the private sector's ability to respond quickly during a crisis.

Question for the future: whether taxi services can become a stable tool for supporting communities at night depends on cooperation between companies, authorities and local communities.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026