Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Britain gives Abramovich one last chance: £2.5bn could go to humanitarian aid for Ukraine

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that issuing the transfer licence is the final step before a possible legal challenge. We explain how the fund will operate and why this matters for Ukraine.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 17, 2025 · 2 min read

Britain gives Abramovich one last chance: £2.5bn could go to humanitarian aid for Ukraine

Why this matters

The United Kingdom has announced its intention to issue instructions to transfer £2.5 billion received by Roman Abramovich from the sale of the Chelsea football club to humanitarian needs in Ukraine. Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced this in a speech in the House of Commons, The Guardian reports. The amount in pounds is roughly equivalent to $2.9 billion, making this decision significant both humanitarianly and in politico-legal terms.

"The clock is ticking, and Roman Abramovich must fulfill the commitment he made when he sold Chelsea and transfer £2.5 billion to humanitarian needs in Ukraine. This government is prepared to pursue this through the courts so that every penny reaches those whose lives have been shattered by Putin's unlawful war."

— Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

The UK position: the last step before court

According to the government, issuing a licence to transfer the funds is the last opportunity for Abramovich to meet his obligation following the sale of the club. If he does not, London is ready to initiate legal proceedings to compel the transfer of the money. This approach combines diplomatic pressure with practical law enforcement — the government is effectively closing the "or else" option.

Where the money will go and who will manage it

The government has announced the creation of a special fund to distribute these resources — it will be headed by Mike Penrose, the former head of UNICEF UK. The fund's structure is intended to ensure the money is directed specifically to humanitarian needs in Ukraine and to minimize the risks of corruption or misuse. The funds are currently frozen in British bank accounts since sanctions were imposed.

What this means for Ukraine and the sanctions regime

First, this is a real additional resource for civilians affected by the full-scale aggression. Second, it is an important precedent: partner countries are demonstrating that sanctions can carry unavoidable financial consequences for individuals linked to the regime that started the war. Parliamentary calls for transferring these funds were already being made in January 2024, indicating this is a systematic demand rather than a one-off political gesture.

The coming weeks will show whether Abramovich agrees to a voluntary transfer mechanism, or whether the UK will commence legal action. Regardless of the route, transparency in distribution remains crucial — partners and Ukrainian authorities must be ready to oversee this to ensure every pound reaches those in need.

Summary

London's decision combines political resolve with legal preparedness. For Ukraine it's a chance to receive substantial resources; for the sanctions regime it's a test of effectiveness. Whether the "last chance" turns into concrete payments depends on Abramovich's next decisions and on how quickly and transparently the new fund operates.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026