Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Britain imposes largest sanctions package on Russia since 2022 — Transneft and shadow fleet targeted

The package affected about 300 people and companies — from an oil-pipeline operator to LNG terminals and 175 firms linked to the shadow fleet. We explain why this matters for Ukraine now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 24, 2026 · 2 min read

Britain imposes largest sanctions package on Russia since 2022 — Transneft and shadow fleet targeted
Фото: пресслужба Транснєфті

Briefly: what was announced

On Tuesday, 24 February, the UK government unveiled its largest package of sanctions against Russia since 2022. According to the British government, the list includes about 300 individuals and legal entities, and the UK’s overall sanctions register now contains more than 3,000 entries relating to people, companies and vessels connected to the Kremlin's regime.

Who is targeted

The main target is the company Transneft, through which more than 80% of Russian oil exports pass and which controls the Russian section of the Druzhba pipeline, which still supplies oil to Hungary and Slovakia. The package also includes three Rosatom subsidiaries (REIN Engineering, Rusatom Overseas, Rusatom Energy Projects), the shadow fleet network 2Rivers (formerly Coral Energy) — 175 companies and 48 tankers — and 49 individuals and organisations involved in supplying components for Russian drones.

Separately on the list are nine banks (Pochta Bank, Avers, Transcapitalbank, Absolut Bank, Sinara Bank, Lanta‑Bank, Bank Tochka, Ak Bars Bank, Fora‑Bank), three companies in the nuclear sector and six LNG facilities, including the Portovaya and Vysotsk terminals. Georgian TV channels Imedi and PosTV were also sanctioned, their activities in the UK being recognised as Russian propaganda.

What this means for Ukraine

First, the sanctions aim to reduce the Kremlin's revenues from energy exports and to complicate the logistics used to circumvent restrictions (the shadow fleet). Second, disabling or limiting companies that service the transit on the Druzhba pipeline underscores the risks for transit countries and creates additional trade and diplomatic pressure in the region.

For Ukraine this matters in three ways: energy security (reducing the aggressor’s income), diplomacy (pressure on transit intermediaries) and practical assistance: Britain announced the allocation of £30 million to restore Ukrainian energy infrastructure.

"It has now been four years since Russia began what Putin thought would be a three‑day operation... the courage and resolve of the Ukrainian people remain unbroken"

— Yvette Cooper, Britain’s Foreign Secretary

International context

The British move comes against a backdrop of difficult coordination in the EU: the sanctions package announced in the EU was supposed to be declared before 24 February, but it was blocked by Hungary in response to the halt of Russian oil transit via the Druzhba pipeline. This shows that even agreed measures can run up against regional interests that the Kremlin seeks to exploit.

In the broader perspective, the key question is whether partners will be able to synchronise the next steps (restrictions on the shadow fleet, related banks and logistics chains) so as not to give the Kremlin opportunities to evade the sanctions. Analysts in leading Western outlets point to the need to close loopholes in maritime logistics and financing.

Conclusion

The UK package is not the West’s only response, but it is a clear signal: hitting Russia’s export channels and the infrastructure that allows evasion of restrictions remains a priority. For Ukraine it is important that these steps turn into practical assistance — from restoring energy infrastructure to cutting off the aggressor’s financing channels. Whether partners can close systemic loopholes is a question for the coming weeks and months.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026