Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Quarter of Processing Halted: Ukrainian Drones Stopped Russia's Central Oil Belt

# Translation Attacks on oil refineries in central Russia have disabled capacities exceeding 83 million tons per year — over 30% of gasoline production and a quarter of diesel output. For the first time since the war began, strikes on infrastructure are directly impacting the domestic fuel market.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Quarter of Processing Halted: Ukrainian Drones Stopped Russia's Central Oil Belt
НПЗ "Кіришінєфтєоргсінтез" (Фото: ресурс окупантів)

Practically all major oil refineries in central Russia have either halted or reduced production following a series of Ukrainian drone attacks. According to Reuters citing industry sources, the combined capacity of the affected facilities exceeds 83 million tons per year — roughly a quarter of all the country's refining capacity.

What actually stopped

The figures are more specific than usual in such reports: the damaged refineries produced over 30% of Russian gasoline and approximately 25% of diesel fuel. The central region is not a peripheral area: these are plants that supply fuel to both the military and the civilian market in the European part of Russia.

According to an assessment by the Carnegie think tank, published in September–October 2025, the attacks affected 16 major refineries with a combined capacity of 123 million tons — already 38% of the all-Russian total, though Carnegie cautions: this is an upper limit of potential losses, not a guaranteed volume of disabled capacity.

"38 percent is the ceiling of possible losses, not a confirmed fact of shutdown"

Sergiy Vakulenko, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

From strike to pump: how this affects the economy

In the first months of 2025, Reuters recorded a real, not calculated effect: approximately 10% of refining capacity was actually taken out of service, which has already affected trade flows. According to data from analytical company Vortexa, cited by Bloomberg, daily export of petroleum products from Russia in early October 2025 fell to 1.88 million barrels — the lowest figure at least since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022.

Meanwhile, the total volume of refining remains below 5 million barrels per day — also a record low over three years. Radio Free Europe reports that Kyiv deliberately strikes the same facilities repeatedly: Russia manages to partially restore operations, but full repairs take months.

Why the central region is no accident

Refineries in the east and Siberia are technically more difficult for drones to reach from Ukrainian territory. Central plants are within striking range. But there is also strategic logic: these are precisely the ones that supply fuel to railway hubs, supply logistics to the front, and civilian transport in densely populated regions. disruptions here simultaneously strike both military logistics and internal pricing.

  • 83+ million tons/year — capacity of halted or partially halted refineries
  • ~238,000 tons/day — daily equivalent of lost refining
  • 30% gasoline, 25% diesel — share of affected plants in production
  • 1.88 million barrels/day — petroleum product exports in October, minimum since 2022

The question is not whether Russia will feel a shortage — the first signs are already there. The question is whether it will have enough repair capacity and spare parts to restore the refineries faster than Ukraine delivers the next strikes: if the "strike — repair" cycle shrinks to a few weeks, Kyiv's strategy will be neutralized by its own effectiveness.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026