Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

State Reserve Gone Underground: How Officials Turned State Warehouses into Private Rental Business

The National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) informed four suspects of charges in a scheme involving state storage facilities being leased to businesses through shell companies — losses amounted to 36 million hryvnias. The scheme began during the full-scale invasion.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 22, 2026 · 2 min read

State Reserve Gone Underground: How Officials Turned State Warehouses into Private Rental Business
Фото: НАБУ / САП

The National Anti-Corruption Bureau and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office notified four individuals of suspicion in a case involving embezzlement of funds from a state enterprise under the jurisdiction of the State Agency for Reserve Management of Ukraine. Damages amount to approximately 36 million hryvnias.

How the scheme worked

In autumn 2022, when the State Reserve was supposed to meet the country's strategic needs amid full-scale war, the suspects developed a plan to monetize state warehouses. Starting from January 2023, officials of the state enterprise, under the guise of storage services, transferred significant warehouse areas to controlled private companies. These companies, in turn, leased these areas to actual businesses at market prices.

«These actions resulted in damages of approximately 36 million hryvnias. The scheme participants converted these funds into cash and disposed of them at their own discretion».

Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office

The difference between what the state enterprise officially received and what the actual tenant paid disappeared into the pockets of the scheme participants. The state essentially subsidized private rental business using its own warehouses.

Who are the suspects

  • Former head of the State Reserve — the highest-ranking official in the case.
  • Ex-deputy director of the state enterprise — direct executor at the enterprise level.
  • Scheme organizer — detained while attempting to cross the state border, currently in custody.
  • Individual accomplice — participant in the chain of fund embezzlement.

The actions of all four individuals are qualified under Part 5 of Article 191 of the Criminal Code — appropriation of property in particularly large amounts or by an organized group. The sanction provides for imprisonment for a term of seven to twelve years with confiscation of property.

Context: a reform undermined from within

The scheme existed in parallel with the official reform of the system. In November 2023, the government adopted a Strategy for Reforming the State Material Reserve until 2025, and in September 2024, it liquidated the State Reserve itself, creating the State Agency for Reserve Management in its place. The goal of the reform is to transition from a "Soviet" storage model to modern strategic reserves management. However, while the reorganization was underway, some warehouses effectively operated as private rental businesses.

The scheme organizer was stopped at the border — but how much of the 36 million hryvnias can be returned to the state will depend on whether the assets were converted to real estate or taken out of the country before the arrest.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026