Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Detective Heads Customs Service: Will Anti-Corruption Experience Be Enough to Break the System from Within

Orest Mandziy came to the State Customs Service from NABU — with experience in investigations, but without the leverage that actually determines who pays what at the border.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 15, 2026 · 2 min read

Detective Heads Customs Service: Will Anti-Corruption Experience Be Enough to Break the System from Within
Новий голова Держмитслужби Орест Мандзій (другий праворуч) приступив до виконання обов'язків (фото - пресслужба Державної митної служби)

On April 15, Orest Mandzii began work as head of the State Customs Service. First Deputy Minister of Finance Roman Yermolichev introduced the new leader to the team. For the customs service, this is a symbolic detail: the last permanent (not acting) director was in place in November 2021.

A Man Outside the System

Mandzii is a detective, not a customs officer. From 2017 to 2026, he worked at the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU): first handling corruption cases in the fourth department, then heading the sixth detective department. Under his leadership, a scheme at the Chernivtsi Customs was dismantled — undervaluation of customs duties cost the budget over 290 million hryvnias. This is perhaps the most concrete line in his resume relevant to his new position.

In the final stage of the competition, Mandzii competed with his NABU colleague Ruslan Damentzov — both received four votes from the commission. This means the agency was headed by one of two possible "NABU people." Some experts reacted skeptically: if both finalists are from the same bureau, is this real competition or merely its form?

What the Numbers Say

The context of the appointment is not ceremony, but numbers. According to the head of the budget committee of the Council Danilo Hetmantsev, due to inefficient customs operations, the state budget loses 100 to 120 billion hryvnias annually. Analysts estimate losses from smuggling and "gray" imports in 2024 at 120–185 billion hryvnias. In August 2024, in a survey about the most corrupt government agencies, the customs service ranked first with 51%.

The appointment of a permanent head of the DCS is not merely a personnel matter. According to Mind.ua, it was included in the structural milestones of the IMF credit program, which had to be completed by the end of June 2025. The government launched the competition only in August 2025 — delayed by almost a year.

Priorities Without Mechanism

"One of the main priorities in the work of the customs service will undoubtedly be strengthening integrity"

— Orest Mandzii, head of State Customs, April 15

Integrity is the right word. But the law on customs service reform adopted by the Council in September 2024 provides specific tools: rotation of officials, integrity checks, lifestyle monitoring, polygraph testing. The issue is not with the intentions of the new head — the issue is whether these norms will be applied to current customs officers, not just to new appointees.

Zaxid.net formulates the essence of the dilemma directly: the customs service is one of the most corrupt government agencies, where schemes are built horizontally between business, law enforcement, and courts. Reform of one agency without changes in related links — this is fighting the symptom, not the disease.

Mandzii was appointed for five years. Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko expects him to create "a modern, transparent and efficient customs system." This is a standard framework for any appointment. What will be non-standard is the result — if in a year customs revenue increases, rather than just changing faces in leadership positions.

The first real test is personnel decisions within the service: will those departments where schemes have been detected for years undergo rotation, or will change occur only at the top level?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026