Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Nine LNG tankers "went dark" off Ras Laffan — Qatar ordered transponders switched off

After Iranian strikes on the world's largest LNG hub, Qatar has imposed radio silence for vessels in the anchorage: a security measure that renders a quarter of global LNG traffic invisible.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Nine LNG tankers "went dark" off Ras Laffan — Qatar ordered transponders switched off
Фото: EPA / HANNIBAL HANSCHKE

At least nine LNG tankers anchored near the Ras Laffan port disappeared from maritime tracking radars on May 11. According to Bloomberg, Qatar instructed vessels in the waters of its main export terminal to disable automatic identification systems (AIS) — transponders that broadcast position, course, and cargo in real time.

The official reason is security. But context matters more than wording.

Port Under Attack

Ras Laffan is not just a terminal. It is the world's largest LNG hub, which before the conflict began supplied approximately 20% of global liquefied gas trade. As Al Jazeera reports, in March 2026, following Iranian airstrikes on Ras Laffan and Messaieed, QatarEnergy announced a complete shutdown of LNG production. European gas futures surged by nearly 50%, Asian futures by 39%.

"The threat to supply security is here and now."

Simone Tagliapietra, energy analyst, Bloomberg

According to gCaptain, following the strike on Ras Laffan, the Strait of Hormuz effectively stopped for LNG traffic: departing tankers were returning due to security threats. Recovery is occurring gradually — Reuters recorded only the second Qatari LNG shipment through Hormuz on May 11, and only thanks to agreements with Iran and Pakistan.

What "Disabled Transponder" Means

AIS signal is the foundation of civil maritime control. It allows coast guards, insurers, and markets to see in real time where a vessel is located, what it is carrying, and where it is heading. When the transponder is disabled, the vessel becomes "dark" — technically invisible to civilian tracking systems.

  • Legitimate reason: protection against missile or drone guidance, which may use AIS signal as a reference point.
  • Side effect: markets lose information about the actual state of the fleet and volumes of gas ready for shipment.
  • Precedent: according to analysts, following the outbreak of the conflict, the number of vessels transmitting AIS signals in the Persian Gulf fell from 1065 to 261 in 14 days.

Scale of Vulnerability

As noted by the IEA, 93% of Qatari LNG is transported through the Strait of Hormuz. There is no alternative route. According to Oxford Economics' assessment, Qatar's GDP faced a sharp downward revision of forecasts, and the expansion of the North Field — from plans to increase capacity from 77 to 142 million tons per year by 2030 — now faces a review of timelines and security assumptions.

For Europe, which receives 12 to 14% of LNG from Qatar, the "dark fleet" at Ras Laffan is not a technical measure, but an indicator: how many vessels are actually ready for shipment and when full traffic will resume — for now, nobody outside the direct participants knows.

If Qatar continues to conduct negotiations on individual shipments through Hormuz in a "each vessel — separate agreement" format, there is one question: will radio silence become a permanent norm for the entire fleet — and then the LNG market will lose one of its key tools for assessing real supplies.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026