Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Drone pierced arch in minutes — repairs will take five years and cost €500 million

After a Russian Shahed-2 strike on the New Safe Confinement at Chornobyl in February 2025, the world received the bill: half a billion euros and a window until 2030, after which corrosion can no longer be stopped.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 24, 2026 · 3 min read

Drone pierced arch in minutes — repairs will take five years and cost €500 million
Фото: chnpp.gov.ua

On February 14, 2025, a Russian Shahed-2 drone penetrated the outer shell of the New Safe Confinement (NSC) — a steel arch 110 meters high erected over the destroyed fourth reactor unit of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The structure cost $2 billion and was designed to last 100 years. It had 85 years remaining until its scheduled retirement.

What broke and why it's dangerous

The strike compromised the confinement's airtightness and disabled the temperature and humidity control system inside. Ventilation is what protects steel structures from corrosion. As warned by Baltazar Lindauer, director of the nuclear safety department at the EBRD, without repair of the ventilation system, irreversible metal corrosion will begin before the end of this decade.

"Without a sealed shell, the entire system will fail… We can no longer maintain humidity within the required limits."

Sergiy Tarakanов, director of Chornobyl NPP — Financial Times

Senior nuclear specialist Sean Burnie (Greenpeace Ukraine) clarifies: if corrosion begins, no one will be able to predict how much longer the structure will hold. Meanwhile, the "Shelter Object" — the old Soviet sarcophagus — still remains beneath the arch and is capable of collapsing at any moment, even without additional damage.

How much it costs and who will pay

French companies Bouygues Travaux Publics and Vinci Construction Grands Projets — the same firms that built the NSC — conducted a preliminary technical assessment. Their conclusion: the facility requires comprehensive restoration. The EBRD estimated the cost at a minimum of €500 million — nearly a quarter of the original cost of building the entire arch.

EBRD President Odile Renaud-Basso clarified: this is a rough estimate without detailed engineering calculations. Firm donor commitments are needed by the end of 2027 so that full repairs can begin in 2028 and be completed by 2030. In parallel, on July 1, 2025, a fifth grant agreement was signed between the EBRD and the state enterprise Chornobyl NPP — €30 million was allocated from a special international cooperation account for urgent work. These funds will go toward structural inspections, temporary shell repairs, and restoration of the sealing membrane.

  • October 2025 — a temporary protective screen installed over the largest hole.
  • 2026 — planned completion of sealing small punctures and partial membrane restoration.
  • 2028 — start of full-scale repairs, provided €500 million is raised.
  • 2030 — deadline, after which corrosion becomes irreversible.

Continental threat with a local bill

Chief Engineer of Chornobyl NPP Oleksandr Titarchuk framed the situation directly: "This is not a Ukrainian problem. This is a continental threat that is being ignored." The EBRD will coordinate fundraising through the International Chernobyl Cooperation Account — the same mechanism that once united 45 donor countries to build the arch. If repairs are not completed by 2030, the confinement could become completely non-functional, and then dismantling the dangerous sarcophagus inside will become technically impossible for an indefinite period.

The Kremlin denied involvement after the strike and accused Ukraine of "provocation." The IAEA has not officially assigned responsibility to either side.

The question is not whether €500 million will be found — 45 countries built the NSC and will gather again. The question is whether firm commitments can be made by the end of 2027: if the donor round stretches due to changes in administrations or negotiation fatigue among partners, the window for full-scale repairs will close along with the functionality of the arch itself.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026