Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

DSST Becomes Sole Contractor for Road Repairs in 40-Kilometer Zone from Front Line

The Cabinet of Ministers transferred authority to the State Special Transport Service as the sole customer for works and procurement related to frontline roads — routes used for military equipment movement, evacuation of the wounded, and supply delivery. The decision eliminates parallel subordination that previously slowed down the start of operations.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 7, 2026 · 2 min read

DSST Becomes Sole Contractor for Road Repairs in 40-Kilometer Zone from Front Line
Фото: EPA / SERGEY KOZLOV

A road in a combat zone is not an infrastructure issue, but a tactical one. Russia systematically strikes at Ukrainian rear logistics facilities — roads, railways and bridges — to complicate further operations of the Armed Forces. Against this backdrop, the Cabinet of Ministers adopted a decision aimed at reducing the time between identifying damage and starting restoration work.

What changed

According to the government resolution, the State Special Transport Service (SSTS) was granted the status of sole customer for work and procurement for current road repair and maintenance in the front-line zone and within 40 km from the line of contact. Previously, authority was dispersed among several agencies, which required additional approvals and delayed execution.

"The government made a corresponding decision that will allow work to begin immediately on priority routes — where troops move, wounded are evacuated and supplies are delivered."

Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko

The list of roads has already been agreed upon with the military. An additional 1.5 billion hryvnias have been allocated for front-line routes.

Why this is needed now

Front-line roads are critical not only for military logistics — humanitarian cargo is delivered through them and evacuation is carried out. The SSTS, as a militarized structure, has the right to work directly in the combat zone — unlike civilian contractors who cannot be engaged in work under shelling.

  • Speed of response: a sole customer — without inter-agency approvals for each facility
  • Prioritization: routes agreed upon with the Ministry of Defense, meaning sequence is determined by tactical needs
  • Procurement: the SSTS was given the right to independently conduct tenders — previously this required participation of other customers

Context: winter left its bill

Since the beginning of the year, Ukraine has repaired over 1 million square meters of road surface damage — by government estimates, the highest figure in the last six years. A significant portion of this damage is not only a result of winter, but a consequence of constant heavy vehicle traffic and direct strikes.

According to ISW data, Russia is expanding the production and adaptation of drones for strikes on logistics, and the campaign to suppress rear routes is already linked to the advance of Russian forces in the Zaporizhzhia direction. Repairs under active shelling is not a construction task, but an organizational matter: who makes decisions, who pays, who bears responsibility.

The new Cabinet decision removes ambiguity in the first point. But how quickly the SSTS will be able to deploy work in an actual strike zone — will become clear after the first public report on completed facilities tied to specific routes.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026