Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Two NABU detectives make the final shortlist for the State Customs Service: how the customs service will change and why it matters

Ruslan Damentsov and Orest Mandziy are finalists in the competition for head of the State Customs Service. The commission’s decision is not merely a personnel reshuffle: the fight against smuggling, budget revenues and business confidence hinge on it.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 27, 2026 · 2 min read

Two NABU detectives make the final shortlist for the State Customs Service: how the customs service will change and why it matters
Фото: depositphotos.com

Briefly

After seven rounds of voting, the selection commission chose two finalists for the position of Head of the State Customs Service: Ruslan Damentsov and Orest Mandziy. Both are detectives of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau who have worked in the agency since 2017. The final choice will now depend on the Ministry of Finance and the Cabinet of Ministers.

Why this matters

The State Customs Service has effectively been without a permanent head for more than four years — after Pavlo Riabikin moved to the Cabinet in November 2021. During that time the post was filled by acting appointees, while systemic reforms and full-fledged management remained fragmentary.

In October 2024 the president signed a law rebooting the State Customs Service, which changed the rules for selecting its head. On 4 August 2025 the Cabinet launched a competition involving Ukrainian and international experts — the commission included business representatives and relevant international specialists. Among them: Andriy Yerashov, Dmytro Oliynik, Oleh Tymkiv, Arunas Adomenas, David Bernstein and Kunio Mikuriya.

What the detectives' presence in the final brings

Pros: the candidates' law-enforcement experience strengthens customs' anti-corruption mandate — operational knowledge of smuggling mechanisms, practical investigative skills, and an understanding of evasion tactics. It's a signal to business and partners: the fight against illegal schemes is becoming a managerial priority.

Risks: customs is not a law-enforcement agency in the classical sense; it also requires management skills, logistics, IT reforms and cooperation with business. Combining an operational approach with systemic management is the main task for the future head.

"Professional leadership of the customs service is not just tough law-enforcement actions, but first and foremost standards, transparent procedures and effective management"

— A customs policy expert

Context for business and partners

For the private sector and international donors, names matter less than metrics: reduction of smuggling, stable customs revenue, implementation of IT systems and transparent procedures. These are the metrics investors and the international organizations represented on the commission will pay attention to.

What’s next

The final appointment depends on the Cabinet and the Ministry of Finance — on their view of the balance between anti-corruption toughness and managerial reform. If a synergy of law-enforcement experience and managerial competence wins out, it could spur the restoration of customs as a pillar of the country’s economic security. If not, the reform risks remaining declarative.

The question to ask now is: whether it will be possible to combine investigative experience with day-to-day managerial practice so that customs becomes an effective instrument of development, and not just a tool of control?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026