Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Ekholm: the EU's drive for technological 'sovereignty' could lead to costlier networks and a weakened alliance

Ericsson’s CEO at Davos warned that hasty moves toward Europe’s technological self-sufficiency risk driving up prices and alienating Washington — why this matters for the security and economy of Ukraine and the EU.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Ekholm: the EU's drive for technological 'sovereignty' could lead to costlier networks and a weakened alliance

About the statement and the source

The CEO of Swedish Ericsson, Börje Ekholm, in an interview with Bloomberg at the World Economic Forum in Davos called for caution in the discussion about the EU’s technological sovereignty. He believes that Europe today does not have the full capacity to be technologically self-sufficient, and that hasty decisions may have economic and political consequences.

"All this rhetoric about sovereignty in Europe is dangerous. I do not think Europe today has the capacity to be sovereign"

— Börje Ekholm, CEO of Ericsson

Technical reality: why the EU won’t become self-sufficient in one year

Ekholm refers to market indicators: in recent years Huawei has increased its share in the European telecom equipment segment, even despite restrictions in certain countries. On the other side are Ericsson and Nokia, which traditionally supply Western alternatives. However, replacing an ecosystem, supply chains and standards is not a matter of a few political decisions but years of investment in manufacturing, R&D and scale.

Economic cost and political risk

Replacing imported solutions with "European" ones could raise the cost of deploying 5G networks and critical services due to reduced competition and scale. Ekholm directly warns of the risk of rising prices in the EU and of possible further estrangement of the US — taking into account recent trade tensions mentioned during Davos.

What this means for Ukraine

For Ukraine the questions are not abstract. Reliable and affordable telecom networks are the infrastructural foundation of defense capability, economic recovery and digital transformation. Fragmentation of approaches among allies can complicate compatibility, supply and joint cybersecurity strategies. Thus the pursuit of "self-sufficiency" by partners must be combined with practical guarantees of accessibility and protection for our communications.

Possible scenarios

Analysts point to three scenarios: 1) a pragmatic combination — a mixed supplier model and tougher security standards; 2) an isolationist path — slow and costly growth of a European industry; 3) an escalation of trade tensions between the EU and the US, which would complicate coordination on defense and civilian projects. Ekholm urges finding "a way to work together," emphasizing the importance of transatlantic dialogue.

"We must find a way to work together"

— Börje Ekholm, CEO of Ericsson

Conclusion

Ekholm’s statement is not a rejection of the pursuit of independence, but a reminder about trade-offs: security, efficiency and cost must go hand in hand. For Ukraine the key is that European decisions should not weaken the allied capacity to provide compatible and affordable communication systems. The ball is now in the politicians’ court: can they combine strategic autonomy with practical cooperation that will strengthen both markets and the security of allies?

Source: Bloomberg; additional contexts — market assessments from Ericsson and Nokia, and public EU discussions about risks to networks and suppliers.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026