Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Energy resilience under pressure: imports from Slovakia continue despite Fico’s statements

Ukrenergo has confirmed: commercial electricity supplies from neighboring countries are operating as usual. We explain why this is important for grid stability and what risks remain.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 24, 2026 · 2 min read

Energy resilience under pressure: imports from Slovakia continue despite Fico’s statements
Фото: LIGA.net / Євген Пилипенко

What happened

Ukrenergo reported on the morning of 24 February that commercial electricity imports from Slovakia to Ukraine are continuing as usual. The announcement came against the background of public statements by Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, who on 23 February promised to stop emergency supplies in response to the halt of Russian oil transit via the Druzhba pipeline after the strike on Brody on 27 January 2026.

Ukrenergo's official position

"Electricity imports are being carried out from all EU countries bordering Ukraine and from Moldova in accordance with the results of auctions allocating available cross-border transmission capacity"

— Ukrenergo, morning briefing

The key message from Ukrenergo is that commercial flows and market mechanisms (capacity auctions) continue to operate independently of individual political statements.

Why this matters for Ukraine

First, imports via Slovakia are not the only source: the import network includes several neighbors and Moldova. Second, emergency assistance from Slovakia was delivered rarely and in small volumes, so its suspension, according to Ukrenergo, will not have a significant impact on the overall resilience of the power system. This means that systemic operations and market procedures currently matter more than high-profile political statements.

What the parties and independent sources say

"...the pipeline is actually operating, and Ukraine is deliberately not restoring the transit."

— Robert Fico, Prime Minister of Slovakia

SEPS, the Slovak transmission system operator, has not sent official documents to Ukrenergo about a unilateral termination of the emergency assistance agreement; SEPS's press service has so far refrained from comments to LIGA.net. This is important: legal and technical steps in the energy sector differ from political public statements.

Political background and risks

Individual political decisions in the region already have real consequences: Hungary, in response to the halt of transit, blocked the agreed €90 billion loan and the 20th sanctions package against Russia; Slovakia and Hungary also temporarily halted diesel deliveries. This shows that energy and finance remain instruments of pressure.

Conclusion

The current situation demonstrates two things: first, market mechanisms and technical procedures are still ensuring supplies; second, political decisions can quickly change the terms of cooperation if there is no transparent legal formalization and diplomatic guarantees. Therefore, the task for Ukraine's partners is to turn operational statements into written guarantees and contracts that will remove risks and support the resilience of the network in the medium term.

Energy market analysts emphasize: short-term stability is preserved, but strategic security requires more — coordinated political decisions and technical guarantees.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026