Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

European Lithium buys almost UAH 895 million of Velti's debt — a step toward integrating Ukrainian lithium assets

Money loves silence: through a Dutch online auction an Australian group took on nearly UAH 895 million of Velta’s loans. Why this matters for the budget and future lithium projects in Ukraine — briefly and without sensationalism.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 2, 2026 · 2 min read

European Lithium buys almost UAH 895 million of Velti's debt — a step toward integrating Ukrainian lithium assets
Фото: Велта Холдинг

What happened

On 2 March Australian European Lithium, through its Ukrainian subsidiary LLC "European Lithium Ukraine", purchased the claims on loans of Velta Financial Company (VKF "Velta") owned by Andriy Brodskyi for UAH 894.86 million. Information about the winning bid in the online auction was published in the electronic system Prozorro.Sales.

Deal format and auction mechanics

The Deposit Guarantee Fund sold the claims in a Dutch auction format — with a starting price of UAH 8.95 billion, which fell by roughly 90% during the bidding to the final ~UAH 895 million. The sole participant and winner was LLC "European Lithium Ukraine".

What this means for the parties

For European Lithium, this is part of a larger plan: the company has already announced its intention to acquire 100% of the shares of Velta Holding (the parent structure of Velta's Ukrainian assets), the investor is listed on the ASX (EUR) and co-founded a project listed on NASDAQ (Critical Metals Corp.).

"Buying up debts at open auctions demonstrates the company's intention to invest in Ukrainian deposits even during the war. The first $20 million from the deal will go to the Ukrainian budget"

— Mykhailo Zhernov, shareholder and non-executive director of European Lithium

For his part, Andriy Brodskyi called the auction a procedural step in completing the bank's liquidation and part of the international integration of the business.

"A new era begins for Velta"

— Andriy Brodskyi, CEO and founder of the Velta group

Context of the debt and previous attempts

The loan obligations were issued in 2011 and 2013; they were restructured in 2023 without write-off. The increase in the amount in hryvnias is mainly explained by currency revaluation — the bulk of the debt is denominated in US dollars, and the currency component grew by only ~5%.

Previous attempts to sell the claims in 2022 and in early 2026 had no participants; the current auction is the first successful one.

Why this matters for Ukraine

The money expected to flow to the state budget (the investor’s representative said the first $20 million) is a direct financial effect in a time of need. But the more important long-term dimension is that the deal could accelerate the integration of Ukrainian lithium assets into international supply chains for critical materials and attract technological investment into mining.

Risks and unknowns

The positive impact depends on a number of factors: the successful completion of the transaction with Velta Holding, access to licenses and permits (in 2026 European Lithium did not obtain the "Dobra" site, which was chosen by other investors), and stable regulatory and judicial practice during asset restructuring.

Conclusion

This case is an example of how private investment during wartime can work for the economy: favorable financial conditions combined with international connections offer a chance to turn troubled debt into a resource for development. Now the ball is in the partners' and regulators' court — from declarations and auctions to real investments and projects on Ukrainian soil.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026