Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Ferrexpo sold its only vessel for $7.7 million and seeks $100 million — while the state holds $80 million of its funds

Mining giant divests assets and considers share dilution amid liquidity crisis caused by sanctions against its majority shareholder Konstantin Zhevago.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 20, 2026 · 3 min read

Ferrexpo sold its only vessel for $7.7 million and seeks $100 million — while the state holds $80 million of its funds
Фото: Ferrexpo

On April 20, Ferrexpo plc announced the sale of the bulk carrier-loader Iron Destiny for $7.7 million and its intention to attract up to $100 million from shareholders through recapitalization. At first glance — typical anti-crisis measures in wartime. In reality — the final point in a chain of decisions that began with an NSDC decision in February 2025.

A vessel with nowhere to sail

The 245-meter Iron Destiny, equipped with four Liebherr cranes, was built for one purpose: to transship iron ore pellets from barges to capesize vessels directly in the Black Sea, so that Ferrexpo could compete with Brazilian and Canadian suppliers in Asian markets. The company purchased the vessel in 2012. Since February 2022, it has been idle — Black Sea traffic is blocked, and the timeline for resumption is unknown to anyone. The board of directors decided not to wait.

Seven million seven hundred thousand dollars is less than one week of frozen VAT that the company is currently not receiving from Ukraine.

The true source of the crisis

On February 12, 2025, the NSDC imposed indefinite sanctions against Ferrexpo's majority shareholder Kostiantyn Zhevago (49.32% of shares) — officially for "systemic interaction with the aggressor country's economy" and criminal proceedings regarding the withdrawal of over $100 million from the failed "Finance and Credit" bank. The sanctions are personal — formally they do not apply to Ferrexpo itself. However, already in March, the tax service suspended VAT refunds to Poltava and Yeristivsk mining and beneficiation plants, citing these very sanctions.

"Personal sanctions against Zhevago should not be used as a tool of financial pressure on Ferrexpo, where the majority of voting shares belong to international investors, including the world's largest banks, investment, pension and sovereign funds."

— Ferrexpo plc, official statement

By the end of March 2025, the state's debt to the company for VAT refunds reached approximately $80 million. Another $13 million of the company's total $35 million in liquidity is frozen in MBaer Merchant Bank and inaccessible. Free funds remaining amount to approximately $22 million.

What $100 million from shareholders means

Recapitalization is a last resort: it dilutes existing shareholders' stakes. Ferrexpo shares on the London Stock Exchange have already fallen to new 52-week lows — 36.50 pence — and in some sessions trading volumes exceeded the average daily figure by 900%. The company warned: without new financing, current liquidity will last a maximum until the end of June 2026.

In parallel, other pressures continue:

  • The SBI has initiated a procedure for the de facto nationalization of 49.5% of Poltava mining and beneficiation plant shares;
  • A civil claim against the plant for 157 billion hryvnias ($3.76 billion) remains in force;
  • "Maxi Capital Group" is attempting to recover another 4.7 billion hryvnias through bankruptcy proceedings;
  • Production has been cut in half — of four pelletizing lines, only one is active.

According to financial director Mykola Klavdiyev, due to VAT blockage, the company has already transferred 37% of its workforce to reduced work weeks or leave. Capital investments in the first half of 2025 are half the planned amount: $28 million instead of the $102 million annual plan.

The logic of conflict

Ferrexpo is a public company on LSE, where approximately 75% of shares are held by international funds, including BlackRock (6.74%). Sanctions against Zhevago strike not only at him: they freeze VAT returns to enterprises where foreign investors predominate, and effectively lead to production cuts by a strategic exporter during wartime. The president of "Ukrmetallurgprom" Oleksandr Kalenkov directly called this "the biggest blow to Ferrexpo."

Zhevago denies the accusations and told Forbes Ukraine that no new investments in the company will be forthcoming if the threat of expropriation does not disappear. He himself is under a travel ban in France.

If Ferrexpo does conduct recapitalization and attract $100 million — a key question will remain open: will international investors agree to invest new money in a company where the state-beneficiary of its recovery is simultaneously the source of its crisis, and will the $80 million in frozen VAT be unblocked before June 2026 when liquidity runs out?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026