Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

FT: France and Italy are holding private talks with Iran over the Strait of Hormuz — what this means for prices and Ukraine’s energy security

Paris and Rome are seeking to restore seaborne oil exports without escalating the conflict. For Ukraine, it is a matter of fuel market stability and macro-financial risks.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 13, 2026 · 2 min read

FT: France and Italy are holding private talks with Iran over the Strait of Hormuz — what this means for prices and Ukraine’s energy security
Фото: EPA / DIVYAKANT SOLANKI

Behind the scenes: what’s happening

Financial Times, citing informed sources, writes that a number of European capitals, including France and, likely, Italy, have begun non-public negotiations with Tehran on the safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The aim is to restore exports of oil and gas without widening the conflict after US and Israeli strikes on Iran that began on 28 February 2026.

The talks are currently at the stage of preliminary consultations and, as FT sources note, there are no guarantees of their success — in particular because European fleets are reluctant to take on the risk of escalation when escorting tankers.

"There are no guarantees that the talks will move forward, or that Iran is ready to negotiate on this issue."

— Two officials familiar with the talks

Why this matters for Ukraine

According to the International Energy Agency, about 20 million barrels per day passed through the Strait of Hormuz on average in 2025 — roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil trade. Alternative delivery routes are limited, so a disruption of maritime supplies quickly shows up in global prices and logistics costs.

The effects are already visible in Ukraine: rising fuel prices and additional pressure on inflation, as reported by LIGA.net. For businesses and households this means short-term expenses, and for the state budget — risks of higher tariff burdens and a need for macroeconomic support.

Risks and scenarios

There are several realistic scenarios: from a temporary agreement with Tehran that would reduce the risk premium in markets, to a prolonged blockade and further price increases. European flotillas, including ships from France, Italy and Greece in the Red Sea, are prepared to act cautiously because of the risk of escalation, which limits operational options to resolve the issue.

For Ukraine it is important that European initiatives be accompanied by diplomatic coordination, diversification of supplies, and financial support mechanisms to stabilize the fuel market in the event of further price spikes.

What’s next

While the talks are taking place privately, the key question is whether these contacts will turn into a mechanism that reduces risks to shipping, or remain an element of diplomatic maneuvering. For Ukraine the consequences of these decisions are not abstract geopolitics, but real money in people’s pockets and the ability to plan economic recovery during the war.

Questions for partners: will European unity and resources be sufficient to pull the global energy market out of this risk-vacuum, and what role will Ukraine play in coordinating such steps?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026