Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Halliburton Ready to Return to Venezuela — What It Means for the Energy Market and Risks to Investors

One of the world's largest oilfield services players says it could resume operations "within weeks" after receiving a U.S. license. We examine why this matters and which questions remain open.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 22, 2026 · 2 min read

Halliburton Ready to Return to Venezuela — What It Means for the Energy Market and Risks to Investors

Briefly

Halliburton said it is ready to rapidly resume operations in Venezuela as soon as it receives the appropriate licenses and payment guarantees from the United States. Information about the company's plans was reported by Reuters and Bloomberg after Halliburton's quarterly results.

What happened

Halliburton CEO Jeff Miller told investors the company could mobilize equipment and personnel "within weeks" if it receives permission from the U.S. government and assurance on payments. In 2020 Halliburton wrote off investments in Venezuela because of sanctions — but it kept the local legal entity, facilities and equipment. The company has also posted job listings for work in Venezuela, indicating preparation for a possible return.

"I am excited about the huge opportunities for Halliburton in Venezuela. We can mobilize in a matter of weeks... and I am very pleased about that"

— Jeff Miller, CEO of Halliburton

Why it matters

First, the return of major service companies shifts the balance in the region: investment in Latin American oil can accelerate production and affect the global oil supply. Second, Halliburton's readiness is a signal to competitors and to financial markets that business could be restored where previously only state-owned or low-capacity contractors operated.

What matters for the Ukrainian reader: any change in global energy flows affects prices and the geopolitical priorities of partners. When Western companies return to markets where their presence was previously limited, it means a reconfiguration of resources, logistics, and the political efforts of international allies.

Risks and open questions

The main obstacles are obtaining U.S. licenses and payment guarantees in a complex political environment. Other factors include operating costs, competition (notably SLB/Schlumberger), and legal and reputational risks associated with working in a country with an unstable political situation. Note also: Halliburton will not return automatically — interest must translate into signed contracts and actual delivery of equipment.

Conclusion

Halliburton's statements are more than PR: they mark the readiness of a major player to respond quickly to Washington's political decisions. The next step is a decision by the U.S. administration and commercial guarantees. Whether interest will turn into investment volumes and whether this will affect global energy flows is a question markets and governments are watching.

Sources: Reuters, Bloomberg, Halliburton's quarterly report.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026