Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Mining company of Australia's richest woman invested $97 million in American defense industry — and this is just part of $133 million rebalancing

Hancock Prospecting's Gina Rinehart shifted capital in a single quarter from Chilean lithium into weapons, gold, and rare earth metals. The logic is simple: the portfolio follows a geopolitical risk map.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 18, 2026 · 2 min read

Mining company of Australia's richest woman invested $97 million in American defense industry — and this is just part of $133 million rebalancing
Джина Райнхарт (у центрі) у день проведення Кубка Мельбурна на іподромі Флемінгтон у Мельбурні, Австралія, 5 листопада 2019 року (фото - EPA / JULIAN SMITH)

In March 2025, private company Hancock Prospecting, owned by Gina Rinehart, quietly restructured its American portfolio. According to regulatory documents from May 15, analyzed by Reuters, the total rebalancing amounted to $133 million — with $97 million going into defense company stocks.

What Was Bought and Sold

Hancock purchased shares in RTX, Northrop Grumman, L3Harris Technologies, and Lockheed Martin. Simultaneously, the company increased its stake in Canadian copper producer Hudbay Minerals by approximately 10% and added shares in gold miner Newmont. A separate document from May 14 showed that in the current quarter Hancock acquired 6.3% in Rare Earths Americas — a company developing rare earth element deposits in the United States.

At the same time, Hancock completely exited Chilean lithium producer SQM — despite jointly developing the Andover lithium project in Australia with them. This is not a partnership breakup, but a clear signal: a public stake in SQM no longer appears attractive.

"Hancock added defense, gold, and rare earth positions to its American portfolio worth $3.3 billion"

Reuters, May 18, 2025

Unexpected Angle: It's Not About Weapons — It's About Supply Chains

The combination in one quarter of defense + rare earth metals + gold is not coincidental. All three sectors share one logic: dependence on critical raw materials that the United States seeks to remove from Chinese control. RTX and Lockheed are direct consumers of rare earth elements in rocket and aircraft production. The stake in Rare Earths Americas is effectively a bet on American demand from that very same defense sector whose shares Hancock just purchased.

Rinehart has long been building positions in rare earth metals through Australian assets — notably, Hancock is the largest shareholder in Arafura Rare Earths with a stake exceeding 15%. Entry into the American rare earth market appears to be a logical expansion of this strategy to where state appetite is currently greatest.

Scale: $97 Million in the Context of $3.3 Billion

Defense purchases represent less than 3% of Hancock's total American portfolio. But the direction of movement matters more than the size: a company that grew on iron ore is systematically diversifying into assets that states consider strategic amid rearmament and fragmentation of global supply chains.

  • RTX, Northrop Grumman, L3Harris, Lockheed Martin — $97 million (weapons and aerospace)
  • Newmont — new stake (gold as a defensive asset)
  • Hudbay Minerals — stake increase of ~10% (copper for energy transition)
  • Rare Earths Americas — 6.3% (rare earth metals, critical raw material for defense)
  • SQM — complete exit (lithium, Chile)

If Washington does launch a large-scale domestic rare earth extraction program — through subsidies or defense contracts — Hancock will find itself in the position of a raw material supplier to those very same companies whose stocks it just purchased. The question is whether American rare earth infrastructure will reach industrial volumes before the geopolitical premium in defense stocks begins to decline.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026