Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Honda: profit fell 61% due to US tariffs and EV market collapse — a lesson for Ukrainian manufacturers

Money loves silence, but these figures are worth knowing: Honda's decline shows how customs policy and waning demand can instantly erode the profitability of major automakers — and why this matters for Ukrainian business.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Honda: profit fell 61% due to US tariffs and EV market collapse — a lesson for Ukrainian manufacturers
Фото: EPA / RUNGROJ YONGRIT

Causes of the decline

Reuters reports that Honda Motor's operating profit in the third quarter of the fiscal year (October–December 2025) amounted to 153.4 billion yen61.4% lower year-on-year. The company attributes this to two key factors: the end of incentives and a sharp slowdown in demand for electric vehicles in North America (which reduced profits by roughly 270 billion yen over nine months) and the impact of U.S. tariffs, which cut results by a further roughly 280 billion yen.

Role of North America

The United States remains a critically important market for Honda — more than two-fifths of its global sales for this period came from North America. When the largest market changes the rules (incentives, tariffs), it immediately reverberates through supply chains and manufacturers' profitability.

Business balance and brand

Alongside problems in the electric vehicle segment, Honda's motorcycle business is showing steady growth — with the largest sales recorded in India and Brazil — which helps mitigate overall losses. The company kept its annual operating profit forecast at 550 billion yen and announced a logo change: the new emblem will appear on electric vehicles and next‑generation hybrids starting in 2027.

"The company's current task is to create a lean operating structure that can respond flexibly to changes in the business environment."

— Noriya Kaihara, Executive Vice President, Honda

Systemic effect on the Japanese industry

Analysts note that the combined profit of the seven largest Japanese automakers (Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Subaru and Suzuki) fell by about 1.5 trillion yen due to U.S. tariffs. This is not an isolated glitch — it is a signal of the vulnerability of an ecosystem that depends on the policies of major buyers.

What this means for Ukraine

For Ukrainian auto parts manufacturers and exporters, this decline is a reminder of two simple truths: dependence on a single large market and on external incentives increases risk; diversification of markets, flexible logistics and raising product competitiveness are the keys to resilience. Institutions and investors should see not only risks but also opportunities — to take niches in global supply chains that are becoming less predictable.

Conclusion

Honda's profit drop is the result of a simultaneous hit to electric vehicle demand and tariff pressure. It's a lesson for the entire industry: profits can quickly turn into losses if a flexible strategy is not built. Whether Ukrainian companies will seize this opportunity depends on the pace of diversification and the quality of management.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026