Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Inditex Returns to Gulliver — And This Signal Is Not About Fashion, But About Sales

Six stores of a Spanish retail group have resumed operations in a shopping mall after six months of closure due to a corporate dispute between state banks and former owners. But behind the return of these brands lies something more significant than shopping.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 24, 2026 · 2 min read

Inditex Returns to Gulliver — And This Signal Is Not About Fashion, But About Sales
Фото: ТРЦ "Гулівер"

Six Inditex stores — Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Pull&Bear, Stradivarius, Oysho and Zara Home — opened their doors at Kyiv's Gulliver shopping mall at the end of April 2026. Massimo Dutti was the first to open on April 23. For the shopping mall in the very center of Kyiv, this marked the end of the longest pause in its history.

How Gulliver spent these six months

The timeline began on October 30, 2025: Oschadbank and Ukreximbank, which acquired 80% and 20% of the complex respectively in the summer of that year through debt obligations of LLC "Tri O", closed the shopping mall for security reasons. The former owners did not recognize the new ones — a corporate dispute ensued with court battles, facility blockades and mutual accusations.

From February 1, 2026, Gulliver formally resumed operations, but most "traffic generators" remained behind closed doors. Inditex and Polish group LPP (except Sinsay) did not return — signs announcing "technical reasons" hung on storefronts.

"Actions are currently being taken between the trading groups Inditex and LPP and the owners of Gulliver shopping mall to restore the operation of their stores as quickly as possible"

— Oschadbank press service, in response to LIGA.net inquiry

What exactly held back the opening, the banks did not publicly explain. But a few weeks before the announcement date, the signs disappeared from storefronts, and goods began to be delivered inside.

Why this matters more than inventory

Yevheniia Loktionova, director of consulting company UTG, directly links Inditex's return with the future sale of the property: the return of brands of such caliber means the shopping mall has passed an audit by an international company. No major foreign operator enters a facility without checking its legal and technical condition.

In other words, Inditex acted not simply as a tenant — but as an inadvertent verifier. If the Spanish group decided to return, it means the legal situation around Gulliver has stabilized enough to sign long-term commitments.

  • Gulliver is up for sale — the announcement appeared shortly before Inditex's return.
  • LPP has not yet returned in full capacity, which leaves questions about the conditions of new rental agreements.
  • The parking lot remains in legal limbo: in December 2025, the court banned banks from obstructing the tenant of the underground parking — LLC "Avtopark Tsentr".

What lies behind this

Gulliver is not just a shopping mall, but a hybrid complex with retail, office and parking components, each with separate tenants and separate legal disputes. Inditex's return closes one front. But as long as Gulliver does not have a new private owner — and the sale of state assets during wartime rarely happens quickly — the next conflict could erupt where no one expects it.

If LPP also signs new terms by summer — it will mean that Oschadbank and Ukreximbank will put the object up for sale with fully restored anchor tenancy. If not — the buyer will get Gulliver with a traffic gap and another round of negotiations to boot.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026