Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

India steps up naval escorts in the Gulf of Oman — implications for global energy and Ukraine

India is sending additional warships to escort its tankers, but is not entering the Strait of Hormuz. We explain why this matters now and what risks and opportunities it creates for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 18, 2026 · 2 min read

India steps up naval escorts in the Gulf of Oman — implications for global energy and Ukraine
Фото: EPA / PIYAL ADHIKARY

Briefly

According to Bloomberg, India is deploying additional warships in the Gulf of Oman and the northern Arabian Sea to escort its tankers. It has been stated that the ships will not enter the Strait of Hormuz — their task is to escort vessels to safer waters in the northern Arabian Sea.

Why this is happening

The conflict in the Middle East has caused significant disruptions to maritime energy supplies. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that in 2025 an average of 20 million barrels of oil and oil products per day passed through the Strait of Hormuz — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade. Options to bypass the strait are limited, so import-dependent countries are forced to seek operational solutions without escalation.

“In 2025 an average of 20 million barrels of oil and oil products per day passed through the Strait of Hormuz — about 25% of global seaborne oil trade.”

— International Energy Agency (IEA)

What exactly India is doing

Sources cited by Bloomberg say the Indian Navy is deploying more than half a dozen ships, including logistics vessels, as a precautionary measure. The decision combines naval presence with diplomacy: talks with Iran on allowing fuel ships to pass are ongoing, and there have already been cases of safe passage for vessels under the Indian flag (according to Reuters after a phone call between the foreign ministers).

Impact on India and the world

For India this is a pragmatic move: to secure critical energy supplies without direct confrontations. The Financial Times has already noted domestic consequences of the energy crisis in India — from interruptions in gas supplies for crematoria to problems in food service. These local disruptions increase pressure on the government and motivate prompt action to secure routes.

What it means for Ukraine

Risks on maritime routes are costly for importers — rising oil and gas prices quickly show up in fuel costs. Ukrainian analysts are already recording a sharp increase in fuel prices and concerns about reserves — LIGA.net has written on this, and experts, including the deputy director of the Association of Energy and Natural Resources of Ukraine, Andriy Zakrevskyi, have explained the mechanisms by which global shocks affect domestic markets.

Practical takeaway for Ukraine: even distant geopolitical events increase the importance of supply diversification, strategic reserves, and diplomatic coordination with partners. India’s actions show that mid-sized players can reduce risks through a combination of naval presence and negotiations — an approach worth considering in our energy security planning.

Interim conclusion

The deployment of the Indian fleet in the Gulf of Oman is a pragmatic response to real logistical risks. It does not solve the problem of a global shortage, but it lowers the likelihood of incidents for Indian vessels. For Ukraine this is another signal: markets far from the front lines can still generate immediate economic risks, so external diplomacy and internal preparedness must go hand in hand.

Now the ball is with the partners: will diplomatic agreements be turned into stable routes, and will this accelerate efforts to diversify supplies — questions for the coming weeks.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026