Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

India Refuses Sanctioned Russian LNG Even as Tanker Was Headed to Its Ports

# Tanker Kunpeng, carrying cargo from the Portovaya plant, drifted at sea for months and disguised documentation to mask Russian cargo – but India refused it anyway. This is the first public signal that fear of secondary sanctions outweighs even energy needs.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 11, 2026 · 2 min read

India Refuses Sanctioned Russian LNG Even as Tanker Was Headed to Its Ports
Танкер Kunpeng (Фото: Vesselfinder)

The tanker Kunpeng with a capacity of 138,200 cubic meters left the Russian LNG plant "Portovoye" on December 21. For several months it drifted in open waters, then began moving south through the South China Sea and on April 25 indicated the Indian terminal Dahej in the western part of the country as its destination. According to LSEG and Kpler data, the vessel never unloaded — it is currently near Singapore waters without a declared route.

Disguise Did Not Help

A notable detail: according to Reuters citing sources, the cargo documentation was prepared as if it were not Russian. However, satellite tracking made the workaround pointless — the origin of "Portovoye" was established without difficulty. This, according to Reuters sources, became the argument against unloading: Indian ports and LNG terminals systematically refuse cargoes from sanctioned sources.

LNG is much more difficult to hide from satellite surveillance than oil — unlike crude, it is impossible to make ship-to-ship transshipment at sea.

Reuters source familiar with the situation

Why India — Not China

The US strengthened sanctions against Portovoye and Arctic LNG 2 in early 2025. After that, the only port that consistently accepts sanctioned Russian LNG is the Chinese Beihai — Gazprom has already sent several batches there. Chinese state companies are willing to ignore American pressure; Indian ones are not.

The reason is pragmatic: secondary sanctions. OFAC has the authority to punish third parties for "substantial support" to sanctioned entities. For Indian banks, insurers and traders, the risk of being cut off from the dollar system outweighs the discount on Russian gas — even in conditions of an energy crisis.

  • India is the largest buyer of Russian seaborne oil, but oil is easier to disguise through transshipment.
  • India is willing to buy unsanctioned Russian LNG — but most of such volumes are contracted by Europe.
  • Moscow is simultaneously negotiating long-term agreements for supplying India with LNG and fertilizers — potassium, phosphorus, urea.

What Happens Next to Kunpeng

Traders interviewed by Business Standard consider the most likely scenario to be that the tanker will ultimately head to Beihai — the only real market for sanctioned LNG. This will turn the Chinese terminal into a kind of global "dump" for cargoes that no one else will take.

If Kunpeng really unloads in China rather than finding another buyer, Russia will get confirmation: circumventing sanctions through Asia is narrowing to a single narrow channel. The question is when this channel will become the subject of separate pressure from Washington — and whether Beihai can maintain its status as the only "shelter" for sanctioned LNG if the US decides to close this loophole as well.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026