Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Iranian strike on Bapco: force majeure in Bahrain could exacerbate energy shortages

Bahrain's largest oil refinery has been shut down after an attack — the effects are already being felt in the markets and at Ukrainian gas stations. We break down what happened and why Ukraine should monitor every tanker.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Iranian strike on Bapco: force majeure in Bahrain could exacerbate energy shortages
Фото: Bapco Refining

What happened

Bahraini company Bapco Energies declared force majeure after strikes hit its oil refining complex. The announcement was posted on the company's official website; as a result of the damage, part of the production capacity has been temporarily taken out of service.

"Due to Iranian strikes and attacks on the plant, we are forced to declare force majeure, which will affect the fulfillment of contractual obligations"

— Bapco Energies (official statement)

Why this matters for the market

Bapco is a key player in Bahrain's energy sector; its refinery has an estimated capacity of about 400,000 barrels per day. The outage of such resources increases pressure on the global supply‑and‑demand balance, especially when other risk factors are also at play.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) has already warned that the surplus seen since the start of 2025 could quickly turn into a deficit if escalation occurs in the Persian Gulf. In addition, supply disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz and the shutdown of the Ras Laffan complex in Qatar add to the uncertainty.

"Military actions can quickly turn a market surplus into a deficit — it's a matter of weeks, not months"

— International Energy Agency (analysis)

Several regional companies have already declared force majeure: QatarEnergy, Kuwait Petroleum Corporation, and Petronet LNG. Qatar's energy minister, Saad al‑Kaabi, has openly suggested that other export entities in the region may follow the same route.

"Gradually all oil and gas exporters in this region may declare force majeure"

— Saad al‑Kaabi, Qatar's energy minister (comment to media)

Implications for Ukraine

The consequences for Ukraine are multi‑layered. First, price impact: already in early March there was an increase in prices at Ukrainian filling stations — a direct market reaction to geopolitical risk. Second, supply logistics: difficulties for tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz force export‑oriented producers to adjust output and routes, which affects global deliveries of diesel and aviation fuel, critical for both defense and civilian supply chains.

At the same time, this is a reminder of two strategic lessons for Ukraine: diversify fuel sources and accelerate procurement mechanisms — when partners declare assistance, it is important that it becomes actual deliveries, not paper promises.

What to expect next

In the short term — price volatility and greater demand for LNG, especially if gas storage levels remain low after the heating season. In the medium term — increased competition for resources among importing countries and higher insurance costs for maritime transports in the region. For Ukraine, this means energy security policy must be practical: reserves, smart spot‑market purchases, and strengthening logistical corridors.

Conclusion: the strike on Bapco is not just a local accident, but a signal to all market participants: geopolitics can rapidly change the supply‑and‑demand balance. The question now is not only who will restore the plant's operations, but who and how quickly will turn declarations of assistance into concrete deliveries.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026