Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Israel partially reopens its airspace: first flight from Ben-Gurion and what it means for evacuations and security

Ben-Gurion Airport resumes accepting flights to return citizens — but only under strict restrictions. We examine what will change in practice, why the decision was made now, and what lessons this holds for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 3, 2026 · 3 min read

Israel partially reopens its airspace: first flight from Ben-Gurion and what it means for evacuations and security
Фото: EPA

Briefly — why this matters

Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion Airport will partially resume receiving flights on the night of Thursday, March 5. This will allow the start of a mass return of Israelis who remained abroad because of the war. The decision is primarily logistical, but its impact — on security and on civilian mobility — is already being felt.

What's changing

According to the director general of the Airports Authority, Sharon Kadmi (source: Channel 12), the reopening will be staged. On the first day the airport will be able to accept one narrow‑body aircraft (~up to 200 passengers) per hour. On the second day — two narrow‑body or one wide‑body aircraft (about 400 passengers per hour). At peak operation Ben Gurion expects to handle around 8–9 thousand passengers a day, and the full return of citizens may take from a week to ten days, according to airport management.

"After an assessment by the security forces, the airspace will open during the night between Wednesday and Thursday"

— Sharon Kadmi, Director General of Israel's Airports Authority (Channel 12)

Procedures and restrictions

The operation concerns arrivals only: departing flights will run empty. Enhanced procedures will speed up entry: luggage will be handed out from the belt without additional checks, but Duty Free items left in storage cannot be retrieved. This is a compromise between the speed of evacuation and minimizing risks on the ground and in the air.

Why this is happening now

The opening plan was accelerated after an assessment of reduced attacks from Iran, the transport ministry says. Earlier reports said the airspace had been closed after the start of a joint operation involving the US and Israel; now the security situation allows a partial resumption of traffic.

Contextual parallels: what this means for Ukraine

The Ben Gurion episode is important as an example of how a state organizes the rapid return of citizens under conditions of partial insecurity. Analysts and Ukrainian officials note that for Ukraine reopening its airspace is more difficult due to a different level of threat from Russia.

  • In November 2024, Marsh McLennan senior partner Crispin Ellison predicted flights would resume from one of Ukraine's airports in January 2025, comparing risk levels: "Lviv is safer than Tel Aviv" — this is more a comparative risk assessment than a universal rule.
  • As Serhii Sukhomlyn, head of the Recovery Agency, pointed out: "They don't launch 'Kalibr' missiles at Israel" — a reminder that the nature of threats determines the capabilities of civil aviation.

"They don't launch 'Kalibr' missiles at Israel"

— Serhii Sukhomlyn, head of the Recovery Agency

What next

This is a step toward restoring mobility for tens of thousands of people and a test for the aviation security system in conditions of post‑conflict instability. For Ukraine the key questions are the same: will a stabilization of security gradually allow the airspace to reopen, and what should international coordination for protecting civil flights look like. In the short term — relief for citizens; in the medium term — another indicator of how military and diplomatic dynamics translate into practical solutions for civilian life.

"This will make it possible to return people home faster, but a full restoration of air services will depend on the stability of the security situation"

— Assessment based on statements from airport management and the transport ministry

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026