Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

A $10,000 Bribe at DAK "Automobile Roads of Ukraine": Risks to Infrastructure Restoration

When the state is at war, every hryvnia is a resource for the front and for reconstruction. The detention of officials accused of extorting a 30% cut of property value undermines trust and could delay the transfer of assets needed to repair roads. We examine the facts and consequences.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 10, 2026 · 2 min read

A $10,000 Bribe at DAK "Automobile Roads of Ukraine": Risks to Infrastructure Restoration
Фото: СБУ

Briefly

The Security Service of Ukraine and the National Police have detained the deputy chairman of the board and the head of a department of the State Joint-Stock Company (DAK) «Automobile Roads of Ukraine», who, according to investigators, demanded a bribe of $10,000 to facilitate the transfer of state property for lease. The case concerns the property complex of a road enterprise in Volyn Oblast. The suspects have been notified of suspicion under Part 3 of Article 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine; they face up to 10 years with confiscation.

Law enforcement's position

According to the investigation, the officials demanded 30% of the property's value — and the complex was valued at approximately UAH 2.8 million. The head of the commercial department of the subsidiary received $10,000 from a company representative; half of that sum was handed over the next day to the deputy chairman of the board. Law enforcement detained the suspects "red-handed."

"For implementing such a scheme, the officials demanded an illicit benefit of 30% of the value of the property, which based on the appraisal amounted to about UAH 2.8 million. In case of refusal, they threatened to create conditions under which the enterprise would not be able to obtain this property on lease."

— National Police of Ukraine, press service

Law enforcement are not currently naming the detained. The official DAK website states that the chairman of the board, Oleksiy Doroshenko, has three deputies: two of them — Ihor Harbaruk and Fedor Danilyk — were appointed as new board members on 5 February 2026; Valeriy Hrachov was appointed deputy in 2025.

Why this matters

Beyond moral considerations, there is a purely pragmatic consequence: when state assets are transferred during wartime and reconstruction, corrupt schemes reduce the resources that could go to repairs and logistics. Secondly, such episodes undermine investors' and businesses' trust — and transparent procedural transfers of property are important for the rapid restoration of infrastructure.

Analysts and anti-corruption lawyers note that the case fits into a broader context: in early March 2026 the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAP) and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) completed an investigation in another criminal case involving the director of a road agency from Poltava region. This points to a systemic problem with management and oversight in the road sector.

What's next

Expected steps include a full criminal trial and a public investigation of the chains through which property transfers occurred. Restoring trust will require not only arrests but also changes in management: open auctions, digital reporting, and clear procedures for transferring assets.

Brief forecast: if the investigation uncovers systemic violations, this could trigger additional contract audits and the temporary freezing of certain property transfers — which, in turn, would slow some local road repair projects in the short term. But these temporary inconveniences are the lesser evil compared with allowing corruption to consume resources needed for defense and reconstruction.

Now the ball is in DAK's management and law enforcement's court: will these detentions be turned into systemic changes that ensure a transparent redistribution of assets for the benefit of communities and the front?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026