Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Who Will Head the Customs Service and Why It Matters: Criticism of the Selection Process and Risks to Anti-Smuggling Efforts

The commission's decision to choose the head of the State Customs Service provoked a sharp reaction from a committee lawmaker. We explain why the choice in favor of NABU detectives has become a cause for concern and what it means for border control and the economy.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 27, 2026 · 3 min read

Who Will Head the Customs Service and Why It Matters: Criticism of the Selection Process and Risks to Anti-Smuggling Efforts
Данило Гетманцев (Фото: Валентина Поліщук/LIGA.net)

What happened

The selection committee chose a candidate for the position of head of the State Customs Service — it could be either Orest Mandziy, head of the sixth unit of NABU detectives, or Ruslan Damentsov, deputy head of the second unit of NABU detectives. The committee's decision prompted public criticism from the chair of the relevant parliamentary committee, Danylo Hetmantsev, who called the competition a disappointment.

Why this matters now

The State Customs Service has been without a permanent head for more than four years — since Pavlo Riabikin moved to the Cabinet in November 2021. The problem of a personnel vacuum intersects with a pressing challenge: border control and the fight against smuggling directly affect state revenues and supply logistics, which take on additional importance during wartime.

Criticism and signals from within the authorities

"The competition was disappointing"

— Danylo Hetmantsev, chair of the Verkhovna Rada committee on finance, tax and customs policy

Hetmantsev says he expected a different logic from the competition — in his view, the vote should have been "not about choosing 'OP‑linked' or 'NABU‑linked' candidates, but fair," with the participation of international experts. The MP also hinted that stronger candidates were among those eliminated and called on the commission to openly explain its choice.

"In seven years you haven't produced a single person capable of passing the contest..."

— Yaroslav Zhelezniak, first deputy chair of the committee

The first deputy's position underscores another interpretation: a personnel shortage within the authorities and an outflow of specialists who do not want to tie themselves to public office under current conditions.

Context: links between anti-corruption agencies

Danylo Hetmantsev drew attention to a possible concentration of influence: in his words, today there is "one overly influential group" in the political space that allegedly has the customs service, the BEB, NABU and the SAP in its hands. Recall that the Bureau of Economic Investigations was headed in 2025 by Oleksandr Tsivinsky, a former NABU employee — a fact that commentators cite as a sign of the "flow" of personnel between agencies.

What experts say and possible consequences

Analysts point to two logics behind the choice: first, appointing NABU detectives could signal an intention to strengthen the customs service's investigative component — more attention to smuggling investigations. Second, it creates the risk of political concentration of influence if senior personnel across different agencies come from the same environment and act in coordination without sufficient transparency.

The consequences for the economy and security could be opposite: effective investigations can reduce smuggling volumes and replenish the budget, whereas consolidation of influence without independent oversight increases the risk of abuse.

Brief chronology of State Customs leadership

  • Pavlo Riabikin — left the post in November 2021 to join the Cabinet.
  • After him, duties were temporarily performed by: Vyacheslav Demchenko (Director of the Department for Combating Smuggling) and Serhii Zvyahintsev (Deputy Head of the State Customs Service).
  • The vacancy has lasted more than four years — this complicates the development of a long-term personnel strategy for the customs service.

Conclusion

The commission's decision is not just an internal personnel move. It affects how promptly and transparently the state can counter smuggling and protect economic interests during the war. Whether the appointment becomes a catalyst for real change depends on two things: open explanations from the selection committee and mechanisms for independent oversight of the new head's work. Without these, the risk that the fight against smuggling will remain declarative remains significant.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026