Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Dovzhenko Film Studio Under Threat: Prosecutors Uncover Attempt to Develop Hectare of State Land

On the territory of a legendary film studio, there are attempts to allocate a plot of land for office construction. The Prosecutor's Office qualifies this as an attempt to embezzle state property.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 7, 2026 · 1 min read

Dovzhenko Film Studio Under Threat: Prosecutors Uncover Attempt to Develop Hectare of State Land
Фото: Київська міська прокуратура

A land plot of approximately one hectare has been discovered on the territory of the state enterprise "National Film Studio of Artistic Films named after Alexander Dovzhenko," which is being attempted to be re-registered for the construction of office buildings. The prosecutor's office announced this, launching an appropriate investigation.

The scheme is standard for such cases: state land that legally belongs to a cultural enterprise receives a new purpose designation — and effectively comes out of state control. One hectare in Kyiv, even without accounting for future construction, is worth tens of millions of hryvnias.

Dovzhenko Film Studio is not merely a cultural institution. It is one of the few preserved large production facilities for cinema in Ukraine, the infrastructure of which could theoretically become the foundation for reviving the domestic film industry after the war. The loss of even part of the territory would mean irreversible limitations for any such project.

The prosecutor's office qualifies the actions as an attempt to seize state property. Details about who specifically initiated the change of purpose designation for the plot and at what stage the documentation process is, are not being disclosed at present — the investigation is ongoing.

It is noteworthy that similar attempts on the territory of cultural and industrial state enterprises are recorded regularly — and most often at the stage when documents are already partially processed. This raises a specific question: does the state have systematic monitoring of the intended use of land at state enterprises — or does the prosecutor's office intervene only when the scheme is already nearly complete?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026