Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

China Is Effectively Displacing Foreign Suppliers of Semiconductor Equipment — Implications for Global Supply Chains and Ukraine

Beijing is informally demanding that, when new production capacities are brought online, at least 50% of the equipment be domestically produced. This is a reordering of forces in the global semiconductor industry with direct consequences for security and the defense industries. We examine why this happened and what comes next.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 30, 2025 · 2 min read

China Is Effectively Displacing Foreign Suppliers of Semiconductor Equipment — Implications for Global Supply Chains and Ukraine

What the decision entails

According to Reuters, Chinese authorities are informally requiring chipmakers, when building or expanding fabs, to use at least 50% locally made equipment. The rule has not been published officially, but companies applying for permits are being directly made aware of such a requirement through procurement tenders.

"The authorities prefer figures well above 50%. Ultimately, they want plants to use 100% domestic equipment"

— one Reuters source

Why this is happening

The decision to strengthen preferences for local suppliers came after the US tightened export restrictions in 2023. When Washington banned the supply of advanced chips and some of the equipment used to produce them, Beijing began urgently seeking a path to technological autonomy. This is not just an economic measure, but part of a broader geopolitical strategy.

Winners and losers

The biggest beneficiaries of this course are Chinese equipment manufacturers, notably Naura Technology Group and AMEC. According to the patent database AcclaimIP (Anaqua), Naura filed 779 patent applications in 2025 — a record and more than twice as many as in 2020–2021. This indicates rapid investment in developing domestic technologies.

At the same time, foreign suppliers — American, Japanese, South Korean, European — are gradually losing ground in the Chinese market, which has traditionally been the world's largest in terms of order volume.

Practical examples and indicators

Chinese firms are already showing progress in critical segments. For example, in etching — a key stage of chip production — China has reached about 50% self-sufficiency in equipment for removing and cleaning photoresist, which was previously largely dominated by Japanese companies. Naura is testing its tools on SMIC's 7 nm lines — these are not abstract experiments, but examples of practical import substitution.

"Previously local fabs like SMIC preferred American equipment and gave Chinese firms no chance. But that changed starting with the US export restrictions in 2023"

— a former Naura Technology employee

What this means for Ukraine

The direct consequences for Ukraine are twofold. On one hand, strengthening China's self-sufficiency increases competitive pressure on global component markets, which may affect prices and the availability of certain elements for civilian and defense technologies. For sectors that depend on global semiconductor supply chains, diversification of import sources and strategic stockpiles of key components are important.

On the other hand, global competitiveness in equipment manufacturing opens opportunities for international investment and technological partnerships — provided Ukraine and its partners can offer stable conditions for innovation and intellectual property protection. For the defense sector this means: secure supply channels, investment in local technologies, and strengthened cooperation with allies.

Brief conclusion

China's course toward localizing chip equipment is not a temporary trend but a strategic reordering that is creating new centers of power in the global semiconductor industry. For Ukraine it is a signal: time to work on its own strategy of technological resilience, look for partners, and prepare for a change in the rules of the game in the component market.

Now the move is up to our partners — will declarations of support turn into concrete contracts and mechanisms to protect critical supply chains?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026