Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Former Westinghouse CEO Stepped Down from Energoatom Board After Three Months — Reports Differ on Reasons

Energoatom explains Patrick Fragman's departure with a new full-time job. People's Deputy Zelenskyy adds a detail the company didn't mention: board members haven't been paid for three months.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 15, 2026 · 2 min read

Former Westinghouse CEO Stepped Down from Energoatom Board After Three Months — Reports Differ on Reasons
Фото: Енергоатом / Facebook

Patrick Fragman — an engineer with over 30 years of experience at Alstom and ABB, former president and CEO of Westinghouse Electric Company — joined the updated supervisory board of Energoatom in February 2025 as one of four independent international experts. Less than three months later, he left it.

Two versions of one departure

The company's official position is laconic: a new job offer in a full-time format does not allow combining it with the level of involvement currently required by Energoatom.

«The decision to terminate powers prematurely is related to Patrick Fragman's new professional obligations, in particular a full-time job offer»

— Energoatom press service

MP from the "Voice" party Yaroslav Zheleznyak adds another detail on Telegram: Fragman and his colleague Brice Bbuyon left, among other reasons, because they were not paid compensation for three months. Bbuyon — a lawyer with experience at EDF International and the French State Council — also submitted a resignation statement. Energoatom publicly confirmed only Fragman's departure.

Context: why restart the board at all

The new composition of the supervisory board was formed after a scandal: Prime Minister Svyrydenko announced an Energoatom restart amid a corruption investigation — the "Midas" case, which affected the company's management. Involving international experts was meant to signal transparency — both to partners and to the IMF, which monitors corporate governance in state-owned companies as one of the conditions for tranches.

The nomination committee approved four independent members on January 2, the Cabinet formally appointed them on February 25. That is, between Fragman's appointment and resignation — less than three months.

What's next

Energoatom announced that a search for a new board member has already been initiated based on the results of the previous competition. The procedure seems to exist — but the question of payments and real working conditions remains open.

If Zheleznyak's version is confirmed documentarily, the government will face a concrete problem: no serious international expert will agree to a position in a state company where basic financial obligations to the supervisory board are not fulfilled. The next candidate for Fragman's seat will likely check this point even before signing a contract — and this will be the first test of whether the Energoatom "restart" has actually changed anything substantively.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026