Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Akhmetov's Company Claims Funds from Subsoil Agreement Fund — So Far URIF Has Only Financed Drones

DTEK Naftohaz is negotiating with the American-Ukrainian fund URIF regarding financing for deep wells. So far, the fund has approved only one of three planned investments for 2026 — and that went not into energy resources, but into defense technologies.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 16, 2026 · 3 min read

Akhmetov's Company Claims Funds from Subsoil Agreement Fund — So Far URIF Has Only Financed Drones
Фото: ДТЕК Нафтогаз

DTEK Naftohaz — the gas extraction division of Rinat Akhmetov's structures — is negotiating with the American-Ukrainian Investment Fund for Reconstruction (URIF) on financing part of its projects. According to Bloomberg, this concerns the "most complex and most expensive" directions: in particular, drilling operations at depths exceeding 6 kilometers, which private capital is hesitant to undertake without guarantees.

What is URIF and where is the money

The fund was established in May 2025 as part of an agreement on mineral resources between the USA and Ukraine. Its financing mechanism is not direct budget tranches, but reinvestment of a portion of revenues from Ukrainian natural resources: 50% of royalties, rental payments and license fees from new permits should go to URIF. According to Forbes Ukraine, from State Geological Service auctions in December 2025 alone, the fund received rights to over 700 million hryvnias.

The fund's investment advisor is consulting group Alvarez&Marsal, decisions are made by a joint American-Ukrainian board of directors. From over 200 submitted applications, eight projects worth a total of $1.2 billion entered the first portfolio — but final approval has so far been granted to only one.

"URIF's first investment — Sine Engineering — is dual-use in its purest form. This is our answer to the question about priorities"

Yehor Perelyhin, Deputy Minister of Economy of Ukraine

Sine Engineering is a Lviv startup from 2022 that produces radio communication systems for drones, resistant to jamming on the front line. The investment decision was made on March 25, 2026. Resource extraction is not yet on the agenda.

Where is DTEK, and where is state Naftohaz

In parallel, the state company "Naftohaz" submitted ten projects to URIF on extraction and energy efficiency. As Kyiv Post reports citing Bloomberg, Naftohaz CEO Serhiy Koretskyi encouraged Western partners to use existing licenses — in particular, for the Olesky block in the Carpathians, where Chevron began shale exploration before 2014 and then exited after the annexation of Crimea.

DTEK Naftohaz — a private structure with different logic: here they do not appeal to past licenses, but ask for financing for specific expensive work. The company has already signed a memorandum with American Baker Hughes at the CERAWeek conference in Houston — the agreement covers deviated drilling, bit services and high-tech operations to increase extraction. But a memorandum is not money.

Why this is not just corporate news

Akhmetov is the richest person in Ukraine, and his presence in a fund created under pressure from the American administration is itself a question. The EBRD in 2024 directly refused to finance DTEK precisely because of ownership structure: "Freeing the economy from the influence of oligarchs is absolutely fundamental," explained bank president Odile Renaud-Basso at the time. DFC, which manages the American portion of URIF, has not yet established such public restrictions.

  • URIF approved 1 of 3 investments planned for 2026 — and it concerns drones, not natural resources
  • 138 applications submitted through the portal, only 8 entered the first portfolio
  • Selection mechanism: screening committee → board of directors (USA + Ukraine jointly)
  • DTEK is negotiating with the fund, but no decision has been announced
  • EBRD previously refused DTEK due to "oligarchic ownership"

Deep wells are not a symbolic project. Drilling at 6+ km in complex geological conditions costs tens of millions of dollars per location, and return on investment depends on whether the military conflict continues and whether access to deposits is preserved. This is precisely why private capital does not go there without external guarantees — and precisely why DTEK is in line for URIF.

If DFC approves DTEK's application, it will be the first case where an American state fund enters a project of a company that the EBRD refused due to de-oligarchization criteria — and then the question of whether the "mineral resources agreement" is a tool for reform or simply an investment window without conditions will receive a concrete answer.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026