Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Every Tenth Subscriber Pays Nothing: Irpin Water Company Sues Debtors While Owing 20 Million Itself

Irpin Water Supply and Sewage Company has launched legal proceedings against non-payers — 10% of subscribers have failed to make any payments. However, the company itself has outstanding debts to Kyiv Water Supply and Sewage Company.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 7, 2026 · 2 min read

Every Tenth Subscriber Pays Nothing: Irpin Water Company Sues Debtors While Owing 20 Million Itself

A situation typical of wartime has unfolded in Irpin: a water utility that has itself accumulated debt to its supplier is now forced to collect funds from its own subscribers through court.

10% — and no payment at all

KP "Irpin Water Company" announced an intensification of work with debtors. Among more than 76,000 personal accounts of the enterprise, every tenth subscriber has not paid for water even once. First and foremost, lawsuits are targeting those whose debt reaches tens of thousands of hryvnias.

Consequences for debtors: forced collection through court, additional court costs, arrest of accounts or property, temporary suspension of water supply.

Water utility sues — and is sued itself

Context that the enterprise does not publicize: in 2024, JSC "Kyiv Water Company" filed a lawsuit against Irpin Water Company for 20.5 million hryvnias — debt for water supply and sewerage services for the period from February 2022 to March 2024. Irpin City Council requested debt restructuring and promised to repay it in equal installments by the end of 2024.

"Debts for utilities are not just residential subscribers. Budget institutions also accumulate arrears, and water utilities cannot simply stop water supply despite this due to the social importance of their work."

Industry analysts, according to ZNAJ.UA

Overall picture across Ukraine

The situation in Irpin is not an exception. As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total debt of Ukrainians for utilities reached 106.6 billion hryvnias — compared to 81.3 billion at the end of 2021. According to the State Statistics Service, in the second quarter of 2025, accruals for utilities amounted to 64.3 billion hryvnias, of which the population paid only 51.5 billion hryvnias — more than 20% of accrued amounts remain unpaid.

Since the beginning of 2024, the moratorium on disconnection of services and accrual of penalties for arrears has been lifted, so utilities received the right to apply sanctions to non-payers.

Where the chain breaks

The problem is systemic: subscribers don't pay the water utility — the water utility accumulates debt to the wholesale supplier — the supplier goes to court. Irpin City Council contacted "Kyiv Water Company" with a request to restructure the debt and withdraw the lawsuit. How these agreements ended was not publicly reported.

  • 76,000+ personal accounts with Irpin Water Company as of early 2024
  • ~7,600 subscribers — estimated number of those who have not paid even once
  • 20.5 million hryvnias — the enterprise's own debt to Kyiv Water Company
  • 106.6 billion hryvnias — total debt of Ukrainians for utilities (Q2 2025)

If Irpin Water Company fails to close its own debt to Kyiv Water Company by the end of 2025 and at the same time does not receive significant receipts from the debt collection campaign — the enterprise will find itself in the same role as its current debtors: a defendant in court.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026