Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

April Anti-Record for Gas Imports: Why 29 Million Cubic Meters Is More Than Just a Number

# Ukraine Imported Minimum Gas Volume in April Since December 2024. Behind This Collapse — Not Reduced Demand, But Price Trap and Concerns Ahead of New Heating Season Ukraine imported a minimum volume of gas in April since December 2024. This sharp decline is not driven by reduced demand, but rather stems from a price trap and growing concerns as the new heating season approaches.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 12, 2026 · 2 min read

April Anti-Record for Gas Imports: Why 29 Million Cubic Meters Is More Than Just a Number
Фото: EPA

In April 2025, Ukraine imported only 29 million cubic meters of natural gas — 28 times less than in March (789 million cubic meters) and eight times less than in April of the previous year (219 million cubic meters). According to industry publication ExPro, this is the lowest monthly import figure since December 2024.

Why purchases were halted

The reason is not declining demand, but price arithmetic. Throughout March and part of April, gas prices in Europe remained higher than in Ukraine, making commercial imports unprofitable. Traders simply waited. This very mechanism — the "import parity" — determines when it is profitable for Ukraine to buy gas abroad and when it is cheaper to burn its own production or withdraw reserves from storage.

The backdrop that makes the pause alarming

The April record low coincided with the moment when Ukrainian underground gas storage facilities (UGS) approached the heating off-season with the lowest reserve level in 11 years. As of May 11, they contained 6.02 billion cubic meters — a record low for the start of the injection season.

"This is the lowest indicator in the entire history of observations" — the level of active gas in UGS at the end of May was only 6.72%.

Sergiy Makogon, former head of the GTS operator, in a Facebook comment

By the start of the heating season, the government plans to inject at least 13.2 billion cubic meters, of which 4.6 billion is to come from imports. This is precisely the channel that effectively closed in April due to prices, but must supply the lion's share of reserves in summer and autumn.

Where the contradiction lies

The situation appears paradoxical: Ukraine ended 2025 with a five-year record annual import — 6.47 billion cubic meters according to ExPro. However, this volume was distributed unevenly — concentrated in months when Ukraine was more expensive than Europe or when the deficit became critical after strikes. April demonstrated the flip side of such a strategy: market logic can halt purchases precisely when storage facilities need to be filled.

  • March 2025: 789 million cubic meters — peak imports, prices in Ukraine higher than European
  • April 2025: 29 million cubic meters — European prices exceeded Ukrainian ones
  • May 2025: 501 million cubic meters — partial recovery, but Makogon called the pace insufficient

For safe passage through winter, analysts point out that daily injection rates must be three times higher than in May.

If European prices approach Ukrainian levels again by August or exceed them, commercial imports will slow down again — and then the question arises: will Naftogaz have time to close the gap with its own production, or will it have to enter winter with a deficit that no market logic can cover?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026