Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Kyiv asks state for 15 billion — and says agreement is already in place

# Kyiv City Council formally submitted a request to the Cabinet of Ministers and Parliament for equal funding of energy resilience: the city and the state to each cover half of the approximately 30 billion hryvnias in total costs. However, the "agreement" currently lacks an implementation mechanism.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 14, 2026 · 2 min read

Kyiv asks state for 15 billion — and says agreement is already in place
Міський голова Києва Віталій Кличко (фото – Київська міська рада)

On May 14, Kyiv City Council adopted an official appeal to the Verkhovna Rada and the Cabinet of Ministers requesting an allocation of at least 15 billion hryvnias from the state budget for critical infrastructure protection, development of cogeneration, and backup heat supply. This is not a surprising figure — it is exactly half of the approximately 30 billion hryvnias that the city and government allegedly already agreed upon as a priority.

«Formalize agreements» — what does this mean in practice

According to Klitschko, Kyiv has an agreement with the government on energy resilience funding in a 50/50 proportion. The Kyiv City Council appeal is an attempt to convert an oral agreement into a document with legal weight. Without such formalization, any «yes» from the Cabinet remains an intention, not an obligation.

«This appeal is necessary to formalize and cement our agreements»

— Vitaliy Klitschko, May 14

In other words, the city publicly acknowledges that even after previous negotiations, firm guarantees are absent. The council's appeal is a tool of pressure, not confirmation of a fact.

Where the money will go: cogeneration is the most expensive item

The public part of the energy resilience plan, which the first deputy mayor Panteleyev unveiled in March, reveals the structure of expenses. The total budget of the plan is 67.5 billion hryvnias, with available funding covering significantly less than half.

  • Cogeneration — 15 billion hryvnias (the largest item)
  • Decentralization of heating — the second largest need
  • Solar generation for 343 facilities — 2.7 billion hryvnias, with only 241 million allocated
  • Condominium associations, individual heat exchange stations, generators — 3.5 billion hryvnias, with available funding of 590 million

In parallel, Kyiv City Council itself voted on May 14 to allocate an additional over 9 billion hryvnias from the municipal budget for preparation for the next heating season — separately from what it is requesting from the state.

Context missing from the official announcement

Kyiv developed and approved the concept of distributed cogeneration in spring 2024 — the first among Ukrainian cities to do so. This means the technical part has been ready for over a year; the delay is in financing. According to experts, a complete reconstruction of the capital's heating system could take between 20 and 30 years: the current 15 billion is not a solution to the problem, but funding for the first real step.

If the Cabinet includes 15 billion in the 2026 budget project, one can speak of real commitments. If the appeal remains unanswered by autumn, Kyiv will enter the next heating season with the same structural vulnerabilities that made the winter of 2024–2025 critical.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026