Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Kyiv lags behind Kharkiv in winter preparations — and now the government may take away part of thermal power plants from Kyiv City State Administration

The Recovery Agency is ready to take management of one of Kyiv's heating hub zones. Six cogeneration units delivered to the city a month ago have still not been collected by Kyiv.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 8, 2026 · 2 min read

Kyiv lags behind Kharkiv in winter preparations — and now the government may take away part of thermal power plants from Kyiv City State Administration
Фото: Вікіпедія

Sergiy Sukhomlyn, head of the State Agency for Infrastructure Recovery and Development, revealed in an interview with Suspilne a detail that rarely makes it into official reports: Kyiv is one of the cities with the worst readiness indicators for the heating season, while the front-line city of Kharkiv reports 98% readiness.

Cogeneration units are here. The city is in no hurry to take them

The Agency delivered six cogeneration units to the capital — mini-power plants capable of simultaneously producing heat and electricity and not shutting down even during blackouts. According to Sukhomlyn, the equipment has been waiting for over a month — the city authorities still have not processed or taken it.

This passivity has a specific context. Back in autumn 2025, Dmytro Naumenko, director of the KMDA department, assured city council deputies that the units would be installed by December. According to LB.ua, as of early 2026, the cogeneration units were still in the installation phase — work on constructing concrete shelters, connections, and testing had not been completed.

2.7 billion hryvnia: money the Agency has never seen

In parallel, a dispute emerged between KMDA and the Recovery Agency over funding for thermal power plant protection. Mayor Vitaliy Klitschko publicly stated that of the allocated 3.7 billion hryvnia, 2.7 billion has already been directed toward work performed by the Agency. Sukhomlyn disputed this: the funds never reached the Agency's account.

"The most important thing now is to protect the substations that power the boilers, as well as the pump groups. Without them, even minor damage will leave people without heating in the middle of winter."

Sergiy Sukhomlyn, head of the Recovery Agency

Both Kyiv thermal power plants — No. 5 and No. 6 — are municipal property of the city, not state property. KMDA is responsible for their physical protection. According to Sukhomlyn, the facilities currently only have the first level of protection — Hesco barriers.

Plan B: the state takes control of a district

Against this backdrop, the Recovery Agency, according to Sukhomlyn, is ready to assume heat supply for one of Kyiv's districts — along with the corresponding thermal power plant zone — if the government orders it. This is not a bottom-up initiative: direct government instruction is required for implementation.

There is a precedent: the government has already instructed the Agency to construct protective structures at Ukrenergo substations — and this protection, according to Sukhomlyn, has proved its effectiveness under real attacks. The logic is the same: where municipal management fails to cope, the state steps in itself.

  • Kharkiv region — 98% readiness for the heating season (head of Kharkiv Regional State Administration Oleh Synehubov)
  • Kyiv — among the outsiders by the same indicator, despite its capital status and greater resources
  • Six cogeneration units for Kyiv — delivered but still not accepted by the city
  • 2.7 billion hryvnia for thermal power plant protection — declared by Klitschko but, according to Sukhomlyn, never reached the Agency

If the government does issue an order and the Agency assumes control of one of Kyiv's thermal power plant zones — this will be the first case where the state de facto takes over part of KMDA's communal responsibility for heat supply in the capital. The question is whether this will happen before the first serious frost or after.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026