Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Kyiv invested 2.56 billion in Kyivmiskbud and squeezed out minority shareholders to 0.13%: what happens now with frozen construction projects

The city has completed the recapitalization of its largest municipal construction company and has become the owner of almost the entire enterprise. However, funds do not yet translate into apartment keys — a queue of projects and a new manager are still being selected.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 21, 2026 · 2 min read

Kyiv invested 2.56 billion in Kyivmiskbud and squeezed out minority shareholders to 0.13%: what happens now with frozen construction projects
Фото: Depositphotos

Kyiv completed the additional capitalization of Kyivmistebudp LLC for 2.56 billion hryvnias: the share of the territorial community in the company's statutory capital increased from 80% to 99.87%. The remaining 0.13% remained with private shareholders who did not participate in the additional share issuance.

How the meetings that decided the fate of billions looked

Shareholders supported the decision to increase the statutory capital on June 23, 2025 at remote meetings. Formally, 2,114 shareholders had the right to participate — only two registered. These two voted for the emission. Kyiv purchased all new shares on its own: as Kyiv City Council deputy Taras Kozak explained, "only Kyiv participated in the capitalization, so its share increased significantly".

The procedure was approved by Kyiv City Council back in October 2024. Over a year passed from the decision to the actual receipt of funds.

Why does the city need almost the entire company

The official purpose of the capitalization is financial stabilization and fulfillment of obligations to property buyers. Almost all construction projects of Kyivmistebudp are currently frozen. The company is developing a debt restructuring plan with contractors and promises to resume work on 24 objects.

"The list of priority objects for which funds will be directed to complete construction will be determined closer to the date of receipt of funds".

Acting Chairman of the Board Svitlana Samsonova, August 2025

Separately, the company is demanding compensation from the state of 2.28 billion hryvnias — the amount Kyivmistebudp estimates as the cost of accepting incomplete construction from "Ukrbud", which the government transferred to it in 2020 without financing.

Four leaders in two years

Parallel to the closure of the capitalization, the company again changed its head. According to Forbes Ukraine, in 2024–2025, Kyivmistebudp changed its leader four times. In December 2025, Dmytro Nikiforov was appointed acting chairman — an entrepreneur with experience in financial markets and drinking water production, without a public construction background. Soon, professional builder Valery Zasutsky became chairman of the board — this is presented as a step toward implementing an anti-crisis plan in 2026.

Nikiforov's predecessor Svitlana Samsonova came with experience in debt restructuring: her appointment in May 2025 was directly linked to the need to settle the company's financial obligations.

What's next

The capitalization transformed Kyivmistebudp into a de facto municipal monopoly in the social housing segment — without competitive pressure from minority shareholders and with the city budget as the only lifeline. This solves one problem (lack of capital) and aggravates another: if the funds go not to objects with real investors, but to administrative expenses or contractor debts, the city will have no external leverage.

If by the end of the first quarter of 2026 Kyivmistebudp does not disclose a specific list of objects with a financing schedule — this will signal that 2.56 billion hryvnias went to patching old debts rather than delivering new apartments.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026