Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Kyiv Built 40 MW of Cogeneration — But the City Needs 173 MW, and It Lacks 47 Billion for Construction

KYMA reports progress in winter preparations: new cogeneration facilities with strike protection and the first diesel complex for water supply. However, the city's own figures show that what has been built is enough to cover only one-sixth of actual demand.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Kyiv Built 40 MW of Cogeneration — But the City Needs 173 MW, and It Lacks 47 Billion for Construction
Фото: depositphotos.com

Acting First Deputy Chairman of Kyiv City State Administration Petro Panteleyev announced: Kyiv has built distributed cogeneration facilities with a total capacity of approximately 40 MW — all equipped with second-level protection. In parallel, the first diesel power complex with a capacity of 5 MW for water supply systems has been introduced. Additional projects totaling over 130 MW are in the active phase.

This is real technical progress. But it becomes different when placed alongside another figure from the same city plan.

One-sixth of what is needed

In March 2026, the Kyiv City State Administration presented the open part of the energy resilience plan at an NSDC session. The total need for distributed power generation for the municipal sector is 172.95 MW. At that time, the available 28.5 MW covered only 16.5% of the need.

Even accounting for the already introduced 40 MW — coverage amounts to approximately 23%. The plan provides for constructing the remainder: 107 MW by September 1, 2026, and an additional 32.2 MW by October 1. The problem is financial.

"It is impossible to meet all of Kyiv's needs with cogeneration. We are talking about powering infrastructure, not the population".

Petro Panteleyev, Acting First Deputy Chairman of Kyiv City State Administration

47 billion hryvnias deficit

The total budget for the capital's preparation plan for the 2026–2027 heating season is 67.5 billion hryvnias. Available funding is only 20.4 billion. The deficit exceeds 47 billion hryvnias. According to Panteleyev, the allocated 10 billion hryvnias in the budget are insufficient, and the city is already preparing a budget revision.

For the cogeneration direction specifically: need — 7.3 billion hryvnias, allocated — 5.9 billion, meaning a shortfall of 1.4 billion. This is a smaller gap than across the entire plan, but the deadlines — September and October — leave no time for slow decisions.

Why "second-level protection" is not a detail

Last winter, all three of Kyiv's major thermal power plants suffered strikes. In January–February 2026, the energy supply deficit in the capital reached 35–40%. This is why new cogeneration facilities are now being built with physical protection — a fundamental shift in approach compared to the pre-war logic of "build and see what happens".

Distributed generation — small facilities at various points throughout the city instead of a few large hubs — also reduces the risk that a single strike will disable a significant portion of capacity at once.

  • 40 MW — built now, all with second-level protection
  • 130+ MW — in active construction phase
  • 173 MW — total need of the municipal sector
  • 47 billion hryvnias — financial deficit of the entire preparation plan

The technical logic of the plan appears consistent. The financial logic — not yet. If by the end of May the city does not announce where it will cover the 47 billion hryvnias deficit, the September deadline will become a target without resources behind it.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026