Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Interpol-wanted person sues president who imposed sanctions on her

Timur Mindich, a suspect in a corruption scheme at Energoatom who was arrested in absentia and placed on Interpol's list, has challenged in the Supreme Administrative Court a presidential decree by Zelensky imposing sanctions against him.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 20, 2026 · 3 min read

Interpol-wanted person sues president who imposed sanctions on her
Тімур Міндіч в Ізраїлі (фото – Українська правда)

On May 14, 2026, businessman Timur Mindich filed a lawsuit with the Court of Cassation in Administrative Cases — case No. 990/181/26. The defendant is President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky. The purpose is to overturn decree No. 843/2025 from November 13, 2025, by which the National Security and Defense Council imposed sanctions against Mindich and his partner Alexander Tsukerman. The filing of the lawsuit was announced by Member of Parliament Yaroslav Zheleznyak.

The paradox of the situation lies in its chronology. On November 10, 2025, NABU detectives conducted searches at Mindich's premises, the company "Energoatom," and then-Justice Minister and former Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko. Mindich managed to leave Ukraine just hours before the investigative actions began. Three days later — a decree on sanctions. Then a warrant in absentia from VAKS and a request to Interpol: in January 2026, both suspects — Mindich and Tsukerman — were placed on the international wanted list. The Office of the Prosecutor General sent an official extradition request to Israel.

What is Operation "Midas" and what is Mindich's role

According to NABU and the SAP, the corruption scheme operated within the state company "Energoatom" — the operator of nuclear power plants that generate more than half the country's electricity. Contractors of the state company were offered kickbacks ranging from 10% to 15%, with threats to block payments or terminate contracts.

In intercepted conversations documented by NABU, Mindich appears under the pseudonym "Carlson," while Tsukerman goes by "Sugarman." Ruslan Magamederasulove, head of NABU's detective division, clarified in an interview with Suspilne that Mindich played the role of a top manager in the scheme, but was not its main beneficiary — the question of who stood above him remains open in the investigation.

"Mindich figures in NABU/SAP investigations related to the activities of 'back offices' — 'money laundering operations' at 'Energoatom,' his influence over 'Sense Bank,' and deals in the defense sector."

KP.UA, review of procedural status of suspects, May 2026

"Dynasty" case: second suspicion and connection to Yermak

On May 12, 2026 — two days before the lawsuit was filed — Mindich received a second suspicion: in the case of the "Dynasty" cooperative in Kozyn, Kyiv region. On the same day, former Head of the Presidential Office Andriy Yermak also received a suspicion. According to SAP prosecutor Valentyna Hrebeniyuk, Yermak is suspected of constructing one of the complex buildings with criminal proceeds. On May 14, VAKS chose a preventive measure for Yermak — he went to pre-trial detention, as a bail of 140 million hryvnias was not posted for him.

Thus, Mindich filed his lawsuit in the same week that NABU and the SAP expanded the circle of suspects in the related case to include his closest associates.

What the lawsuit could achieve

Sanctions restrict Mindich's assets in Ukraine and complicate his financial operations. Their cancellation through court — for now, the only legal instrument available to a person outside the country avoiding extradition. At the same time, the Court of Cassation in Administrative Cases examines the legality of the procedure for imposing sanctions, not the justification of suspicions in criminal cases: these are different proceedings with different standards of proof.

  • Mindich is suspected in at least two criminal proceedings: "Midas" (Energoatom) and "Dynasty"
  • Arrested in absentia by VAKS; after an appeal in April 2026, the suspicion remained in force
  • On Interpol's wanted list since January 2026
  • The Office of the Prosecutor General sent an extradition request to Israel
  • Pseudonym "Carlson" in NABU materials; Tsukerman ("Sugarman") — in the same status

If the Court of Cassation satisfies the lawsuit and recognizes the sanctions procedure as unlawful, this will not remove the criminal suspicions — but will open up the possibility for Mindich to operate the blocked assets even before any verdict. The question is different: whether Israel will agree to extradition before the court manages to consider the lawsuit on the merits.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026