Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Russia's February Collapse Proved Temporary: How Moscow Doubled Oil Revenues Despite Strikes on Ports

# Russia's Oil Revenues Surge to $19 Billion in March 2025 Russia's oil revenues reached $19 billion in March 2025—double the figure from February, which had been the worst month since the full-scale invasion began. The resilience of the shadow fleet and the redirection of maritime routes have again proven stronger than attacks on these systems.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 14, 2026 · 2 min read

Russia's February Collapse Proved Temporary: How Moscow Doubled Oil Revenues Despite Strikes on Ports
Фото: EPA

February 2025 seemed like a turning point: Russia's oil revenues fell to their lowest level since February 2022. Strikes on the Baltic ports of Ust-Luga and Primorsk, the halt of the Druzhba pipeline, sanctions pressure — all of this seemed to finally strike at the Kremlin's main artery. But March data from the IEA, cited by Reuters, dispelled this optimism in one line: $19 billion — twice as much as a month earlier.

How this became possible

The key mechanism is maritime re-export. Russia's total supply volume increased by 270,000 barrels per day, to 4.6 million b/d, and this happened precisely due to an increase in maritime shipments. Pipelines suffered a minus, the sea compensated with surplus.

According to the Kyiv School of Economics (KSE Institute), Russia is systematically building a "shadow fleet" — a network of aging tankers that transport oil beyond Western oversight. This tool has repeatedly proven its effectiveness: each time sanctions or attacks blocked one route, the fleet would redistribute to another.

"The Russian oil trading system is extremely flexible and responds quickly to external pressure"

Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin spokesman

This confidence is not merely propaganda. It is backed by statistics: despite all the strikes of 2024–2025, Russia's total oil export volume remained relatively stable.

What really pressured — and why it didn't work in March

  • Attacks on Baltic ports forced a redistribution of flows, but did not stop them — maritime shipments from alternative terminals increased.
  • The halt of Druzhba hit the pipeline segment, but pipelines' share in Russia's total exports has long ceased to be dominant.
  • Sanctions pressure increased logistics costs, but Russia passes these expenses on to buyers — China and India, which together account for over 80% of oil exports.

Long-term dynamics — are different

March's recovery does not negate the structural trend. According to the KSE Institute's forecast, Russia's cumulative oil revenues in 2025 will amount to approximately $155 billion — significantly less than 2022–2023 levels. Urals crude trades at a significant discount: if the Kremlin's budget was calculated at ~$70 per barrel, actual prices in 2025 were substantially lower. The IEA forecasts a global oil surplus in 2026 exceeding 4 million b/d — which means a further price decline that the shadow fleet cannot already compensate for with volume.

Notably, the greatest structural risk for Russia is not Ukrainian strikes per se, but a market surplus. According to estimates by the CREA analytical center, lowering the price ceiling from $60 to $30 per barrel would reduce Russia's oil revenues by 39% from December 2022. The West has yet to dare take this step.

The question that will determine the effectiveness of pressure on Russia through the end of 2025: will the US and EU dare to lower the oil price ceiling to a level that truly hits the Kremlin's budget, or will they keep it as a diplomatic tool in negotiations, where Moscow so far sees more concessions than sanctions pressure?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026