Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Musk Froze Data Center Construction — and Now the Governor Must Choose Between Jobs and Precedent

Maine became the first state in the US where lawmakers voted for a complete moratorium on large data centers. However, Governor Janet Mills has not yet signed the bill — and her hesitation reveals a real rift in debates over AI infrastructure.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 15, 2026 · 2 min read

Musk Froze Data Center Construction — and Now the Governor Must Choose Between Jobs and Precedent
Фото: depositphotos.com

20 megawatts — that's approximately how much electricity 16,000 American households consume. Lawmakers in Maine chose this threshold as the dividing line: any data center with a capacity of 20 MW or higher will not receive approval until November 2027. More than 140 local groups across the country have already blocked or delayed over 60 billion dollars in data center investments in just over a year — but Maine went further, becoming the first state with a statewide ban.

How they voted and what was banned

The state House of Representatives passed bill LD 307 by a vote of 79–62, after which the senate sent it to the governor with a result of 21–13. The law prohibits state, municipal, and quasi-governmental agencies from issuing permits or any approvals until November 2027. In parallel, a coordination council is being created with government officials, experts, and stakeholders — it is tasked with developing recommendations regarding the impact of data centers on the power system and water resources.

Governor's block: 550 million dollars and a former paper mill

The law has not yet taken effect. Democratic Governor Janet Mills stated she will only sign it if there is a separate exemption for a 550 million dollar project at the site of the former Androscoggin paper mill in the city of Jay.

"The people of Jay need these jobs — with proper safeguards to preserve water and energy resources"

— Governor Janet Mills, April 2025

Lawmakers considered the possibility of adding exemptions that could save the Jay project, but ultimately passed the law without them. The governor's office did not respond to requests about a possible veto.

Is Maine an exception or the start of a trend?

Some states and municipalities are introducing restrictions on electricity and water consumption by data centers, requirements for disclosing information to communities. South Carolina Republican Stephen Long, who is a co-author of a similar moratorium in his state, says: "Public policy simply cannot keep up with how rapidly everything is changing". The organization Food & Water Watch is promoting similar bills in California, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.

Opponents of the law appeal to economics: "The moratorium deters investments not only from the data center industry, but also from other advanced industries that rely on predictability and a favorable business climate", — CNN presents the industry's argument.

The real stakes here are not in the server racks themselves. Maine is a sparsely populated state with an outdated industrial base: former paper mills stand empty, and this is where technology companies came with their offers. A moratorium without exemptions means these sites will remain unoccupied at least until 2027.

If Mills signs the law without an exemption for Jay — will the moratorium withstand a legal challenge from investors, or will the state set a precedent that rewrites the rules for the entire country?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026